Starwars Imperial Navy and Rebel Forces V. Mass effct Reaprs

[THE UNITED FEDERATION OF ALGORENIA]

I was just wondering who would win in this epic showdown and how the battles in ME3 would have played out differently if there were more aliens and powerful weapons.

For starters,

I know The Imperial Navy and Rebels have a far larger number of clone forces reaching into the millions and even billions, and an even wider number of diverse and unique alien races spread throughout out many galaxies, and unlike the Crucible in ME3, the Death star is a known and fully functioning Planet Destroyer.

But i do know the Reapers Were the Alphas and the Omegas of history and can easily slaughter an entire legion of plastic storm troopers. They were also quite evasive and could destroy planets in mere hours.

the only thing i have going for the imperials and the rebels is the Death star, but whats your take on the idea?

[Lazssia]

Here's a little holiday gift of advice: Never post VS threads. They do not end well.

[Bojikami]

Oh no. May the war begin....

[TotallyNotTNELsPuppet]

Reapers. This isn't really much of a versus when one side has billions of years of tech on their sides.

[Oterro]

reapers are stupid plot devices so them i guess.

[Wisconsin9]

I haven't even played ME and I can safely say Reapers.

[AETEN II]

I haven't even played ME and I can safely say Reapers.

They don't have shields.

The Empire alone could ROFL stomp Mass Effect. Do you even know some of the shit they bring to the fight? Their average Battleship size is around five kilometers. Imperial II-Class Star Destroyers are just dwarf battleships by the Empire's standards, and they're a kilometer long and have the firepower to go base-delta-zero on a planet in a couple hours. Then there's the shitton of superweapons, ion weaponry which would screw over a reaper with a single shot, etc. They can clone, train, and equip and entire battalion in a week at minimum. Then there's the droids, like the Darktroopers.

The only thing Mass Effect could stand up to would be the Enterprise Series Era of the Federation from Star Trek, when the Fed ships lacked shields. And they still would probably take the Reapers with them.

[Conserative Morality]

Imperial Navy. The Reapers aren't invincible, just very hard to destroy by Mass Effect standards, and the Imperial Navy outclasses them both.

[The Orson Empire]

Imperial Navy. They would mop the floor with the Reapers.

[Constaniana]

Imperial Navy. The Reapers aren't invincible, just very hard to destroy by Mass Effect standards, and the Imperial Navy outclasses them both.

^This.

[Meritocratic States]

The Reapers from Mass Effect can beat the Imperial and Rebel forces, period.

Reaper Capital Ships has a technique called indoctrination.

Reaper "indoctrination" is an insidious means of corrupting organic minds, "reprogramming" the brain through physical and psychological conditioning using electromagnetic fields, infrasonic and ultrasonic noise, and other subliminal methods. The Reaper's resulting control over the limbic system leaves the victim highly susceptible to its suggestions.
Organics undergoing indoctrination may complain of headaches and buzzing or ringing in their ears. As time passes, they have feelings of "being watched" and hallucinations of "ghostly" presences. Ultimately, the Reaper gains the ability to use the victim's body to amplify its signals, manifesting as "alien" voices in the mind.

Indoctrination can create perfect deep cover agents. A Reaper's "suggestions" can manipulate victims into betraying friends, trusting enemies, or viewing the Reaper itself with superstitious awe. Should a Reaper subvert a well-placed political or military leader, the resulting chaos can bring down nations.

Long-term physical effects of the manipulation are unsustainable. Higher mental functioning decays, ultimately leaving the victim a gibbering animal. Rapid indoctrination is possible, but causes this decay in days or weeks. Slow, patient indoctrination allows the thrall to last for months or years.

TL;DR, indoctrination can corrupt minds of important individuals such as the Emperor or Admiral Ackbar and cause them to fight on the Reaper's side. Not only that, every race that the Reaper has fought since the first cycles of extinction billions of years ago eventually became Reapers themselves. That means, Reaper Ships might outnumber both the Imperial and Rebel Navies.

According to the Mass Effect Codex, Reaper Ships have a highly devastating weapon called a magnetohydrodynamic cannon that can effortlessly punch armour and shields.

Now, did I miss something?

[Conserative Morality]

The Reapers from Mass Effect can beat the Imperial and Rebel forces, period.

Reaper Capital Ships has a technique called indoctrination.

TL;DR, indoctrination can corrupt minds of important individuals such as the Emperor or Admiral Ackbar and cause them to fight on the Reaper's side. Not only that, every race that the Reaper has fought since the first cycles of extinction billions of years ago eventually became Reapers themselves. That means, Reaper Ships might outnumber both the Imperial and Rebel Navies.

According to the Mass Effect Codex, Reaper Ships have a highly devastating weapon called a magnetohydrodynamic cannon that can effortlessly punch armour and shields.

Now, did I miss something?

Yes, namely the fact that indoctrination takes both time and exposure to Reaper tech. Also the fact that Council forces took out several Reapers with some of their heavier ships, and that the mainstay of the Imperial Navy is the Imperial Class Star Destroyer, which outclasses even the heaviest ships of the Council races, and that of those alone they have thousands of...

And so on.

[Constaniana]

The Reapers from Mass Effect can beat the Imperial and Rebel forces, period.

Reaper Capital Ships has a technique called indoctrination.

TL;DR, indoctrination can corrupt minds of important individuals such as the Emperor or Admiral Ackbar and cause them to fight on the Reaper's side. Not only that, every race that the Reaper has fought since the first cycles of extinction billions of years ago eventually became Reapers themselves. That means, Reaper Ships might outnumber both the Imperial and Rebel Navies.

According to the Mass Effect Codex, Reaper Ships have a highly devastating weapon called a magnetohydrodynamic cannon that can effortlessly punch armour and shields.

Now, did I miss something?

Yes, namely the fact that indoctrination takes both time and exposure to Reaper tech. Also the fact that Council forces took out several Reapers with some of their heavier ships, and that the mainstay of the Imperial Navy is the Imperial Class Star Destroyer, which outclasses even the heaviest ships of the Council races, and that of those alone they have thousands of...

And so on.

And that's not even counting the rebel ships assisting too.

[Vareiln]

The Reapers from Mass Effect can beat the Imperial and Rebel forces, period.

Reaper Capital Ships has a technique called indoctrination.

Reaper "indoctrination" is an insidious means of corrupting organic minds, "reprogramming" the brain through physical and psychological conditioning using electromagnetic fields, infrasonic and ultrasonic noise, and other subliminal methods. The Reaper's resulting control over the limbic system leaves the victim highly susceptible to its suggestions.
Organics undergoing indoctrination may complain of headaches and buzzing or ringing in their ears. As time passes, they have feelings of "being watched" and hallucinations of "ghostly" presences. Ultimately, the Reaper gains the ability to use the victim's body to amplify its signals, manifesting as "alien" voices in the mind.

Indoctrination can create perfect deep cover agents. A Reaper's "suggestions" can manipulate victims into betraying friends, trusting enemies, or viewing the Reaper itself with superstitious awe. Should a Reaper subvert a well-placed political or military leader, the resulting chaos can bring down nations.

Long-term physical effects of the manipulation are unsustainable. Higher mental functioning decays, ultimately leaving the victim a gibbering animal. Rapid indoctrination is possible, but causes this decay in days or weeks. Slow, patient indoctrination allows the thrall to last for months or years.

TL;DR, indoctrination can corrupt minds of important individuals such as the Emperor or Admiral Ackbar and cause them to fight on the Reaper's side. Not only that, every race that the Reaper has fought since the first cycles of extinction billions of years ago eventually became Reapers themselves. That means, Reaper Ships might outnumber both the Imperial and Rebel Navies.

According to the Mass Effect Codex, Reaper Ships have a highly devastating weapon called a magnetohydrodynamic cannon that can effortlessly punch armour and shields.

Now, did I miss something?

Doesn't indoctrination require proximity, though?
Also, this is some really random fan-wankery, but it's likely that one who's strong with the Force could resist such a thing.

[Vareiln]

Yes, namely the fact that indoctrination takes both time and exposure to Reaper tech. Also the fact that Council forces took out several Reapers with some of their heavier ships, and that the mainstay of the Imperial Navy is the Imperial Class Star Destroyer, which outclasses even the heaviest ships of the Council races, and that of those alone they have thousands of...

And so on.

And that's not even counting the rebel ships assisting too.

Hehehe... Squidcuttelfish robot things versus ships built by octopusmen.

[Dorlania]

Imperial Navy. The Reapers aren't invincible, just very hard to destroy by Mass Effect standards, and the Imperial Navy outclasses them both.

[New Sapienta]

Reapers, simply because there are so many and their so big.

Also, fear factor.

[Gauntleted Fist]

The Imperials would wipe them out by themselves. I mean, there are 25,000+ ISDs in commission, and every single one is capable of glassing a planet in a few hours. This doesn't count the tens of thousands of Victory-class, and the super star destroyers floating around. Also doesn't count the crazy ass super weapons.


This doesn't even begin to count the ludicrous numbers used to justify the "power" of things in the Star War's universe. The Death Star's superlaser is equivalent to 522,600 suns in power output, for example.

[Ibis Galaxy Alliance]

These are the specs for an outdated SW troop transport used during the clone wars:



Length:752 meters

Weapons

12 quad turbolaser turrets: 200 gigatons per shot

24 laser cannons: Light guns: 6 megatons per shot

4 missile/torpedo tubes


Other Technical Data

Sublight acceleration: 3500G

Operational range: 250,000 light-years (before refueling)

Shield heat dissipation: 70 trillion GW peak

Reactor power: 200 trillion GW max

200 gigatons is equivelant to approxomately 500,000 liquid tungsten railgun shots.

For sources:http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

In other words, Empire curbstomps.

[Yes Im Biop]

This will end badly, But Reaper's simply because they have number's and their main gun is a focused nuclear strike of power

[Yes Im Biop]

I haven't even played ME and I can safely say Reapers.

They don't have shields.

The Empire alone could ROFL stomp Mass Effect. Do you even know some of the shit they bring to the fight? Their average Battleship size is around five kilometers. Imperial II-Class Star Destroyers are just dwarf battleships by the Empire's standards, and they're a kilometer long and have the firepower to go base-delta-zero on a planet in a couple hours. Then there's the shitton of superweapons, ion weaponry which would screw over a reaper with a single shot, etc. They can clone, train, and equip and entire battalion in a week at minimum. Then there's the droids, like the Darktroopers.

The only thing Mass Effect could stand up to would be the Enterprise Series Era of the Federation from Star Trek, when the Fed ships lacked shields. And they still would probably take the Reapers with them.

Yes they do, very very strong one's at that

[Gauntleted Fist]

This will end badly, But Reaper's simply because they have number's and their main gun is a focused nuclear strike of power

Wouldn't even faze an ISD's shield. Hell it wouldn't even flicker. Considering an ISD's shield can deflect around 70 million TW of power at any one point on its surface. That's more power than the entirety of planet Earth will produce for the next dozen decades.

You could blow up Hiroshima-sized bombs against it for years and not penetrate it. Basically comparing universes is stupid, but comparing anything to Star Wars is especially stupid because people come up with real number to justify the shit they saw. Like the Death Star superlaser's lower power limit (As in the absolute minimum required) is equivalent to 522,600 suns in power output.

[Ibis Galaxy Alliance]

This will end badly, But Reaper's simply because they have number's and their main gun is a focused nuclear strike of power

A single heavy turbolaser deals 465,116 times the damage of a Liquid Tungsten Railgun.

[Bojikami]

Reapers. Just... reapers.

[Ibis Galaxy Alliance]

Reapers. Just... reapers.

Again:

These are the specs for an outdated SW troop transport used during the clone wars:



Length:752 meters

Weapon

12 quad turbolaser turrets: 200 gigatons per shot

24 laser cannons: Light guns: 6 megatons per shot

4 missile/torpedo tubes


Other Technical Data

Sublight acceleration: 3500G

Operational range: 250,000 light-years (before refueling)

Shield heat dissipation: 70 trillion GW peak

Reactor power: 200 trillion GW max

200 gigatons is equivelant to approxomately 500,000 liquid tungsten railgun shots.

For sources:http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Essays/FiveMinutes.html

In other words, Empire curbstomps.