NATION

PASSWORD

Paradox Games!

A coffee shop for those who like to discuss art, music, books, movies, TV, each other's own works, and existential angst.

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Garwall
Minister
 
Posts: 3412
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Garwall » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:07 pm

Southern Babylonia wrote:I've had a game of EU3 going on for quite some time now (started in 1405 because I'm a pussy), and I managed to get out of a war fairly cheap with a super-powerful Bohemia, a super-rich Holsteiner Emperor and a coalition of Muslim states (not the least of which is a giant Khorasan). The year is 1788 or 89, IDK which, and I westernised around 1560. Still rebuilding. I've decided that instead of letting the screenshot show you my empire, I'd draw a more aesthetically pleasing version (of the European part at least) in Paint that doesn't have to rely on province lines, at that it would more probably resemble irl had it existed.
Here ya go.


As the Byzantines, or Ottomans, or...?

Looks like Byzantines to me. Had a fun Byzantines game, but i stopped playing it because my research was dead in the water. Conquering the Mamluks sends your research to shit.
1 Student
Nationality: Yankee
Religion: Atheist
Ideology: Socialist
Issues: State Capitalism/Full Citizenship
Cash Reserves: ~1$
Revoltrisk: 85%
Militancy: 9
Counsciousness: 12
"For Home and Countrymen!"

-Battle-cry used by Garwall Revolutionaries as they storm the Capitol Building, raising the Rebel Flag.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=132814#p6655830
Above: The Treaty of Belgratz, the Document ratifying the Socialist Party's rise to power in Garwall.

[15:43] <Parhe> For some reason
[15:43] <Parhe> I feel safe whenever Gar is here
[15:43] <Parhe> Not sure why, Garwall always made me feel safe

User avatar
Southern Babylonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Babylonia » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:09 pm

Garwall wrote:
Southern Babylonia wrote:I've had a game of EU3 going on for quite some time now (started in 1405 because I'm a pussy), and I managed to get out of a war fairly cheap with a super-powerful Bohemia, a super-rich Holsteiner Emperor and a coalition of Muslim states (not the least of which is a giant Khorasan). The year is 1788 or 89, IDK which, and I westernised around 1560. Still rebuilding. I've decided that instead of letting the screenshot show you my empire, I'd draw a more aesthetically pleasing version (of the European part at least) in Paint that doesn't have to rely on province lines, at that it would more probably resemble irl had it existed.
Here ya go.


As the Byzantines, or Ottomans, or...?

Looks like Byzantines to me. Had a fun Byzantines game, but i stopped playing it because my research was dead in the water. Conquering the Mamluks sends your research to shit.

Luckily I got them early and then had a leader who was conveniently good in everything but diplomacy, that's when I got in the westernisation and blasted ahead of the then puny Castille.

And yeah, Byzantines. I hate to say I'm kinda smug.
Impeach the Senate, Legalise Cap and Trade, Prorogations are theft. JACK LAYTON 2011

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08
Alignment: Neutral Good
Yeh: Collectivism, Market Socialism, Environmentalism, Two-State Solution, QUILTBAG rights, abortion rights, permaculture, multiculturalism, CBC, public healthcare, NDP (Canada), SNP.
Meh: most religions, atheism, globalisation, gun rights.
Neh: Corporatocracy, neoliberalism, Maoism, bigotry, evangelism, militant anti-theism, fascism, pollution, Netanyahu, Hamas, tar sands, monoculturalism.
Need help with French? Je peux aider!
Proud Nova Scotian.

User avatar
DrakoBlaria
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9422
Founded: Jan 31, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DrakoBlaria » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:10 pm

Garwall wrote:
Southern Babylonia wrote:I've had a game of EU3 going on for quite some time now (started in 1405 because I'm a pussy), and I managed to get out of a war fairly cheap with a super-powerful Bohemia, a super-rich Holsteiner Emperor and a coalition of Muslim states (not the least of which is a giant Khorasan). The year is 1788 or 89, IDK which, and I westernised around 1560. Still rebuilding. I've decided that instead of letting the screenshot show you my empire, I'd draw a more aesthetically pleasing version (of the European part at least) in Paint that doesn't have to rely on province lines, at that it would more probably resemble irl had it existed.
Here ya go.


As the Byzantines, or Ottomans, or...?

Looks like Byzantines to me. Had a fun Byzantines game, but i stopped playing it because my research was dead in the water. Conquering the Mamluks sends your research to shit.


Tech in this game works in a retarded way
Kleomentia wrote:Almighty Hellenic Overlord of Slavya, he who is the son of Zeus and the father of Greekishness.
When Greeks stop being nationalists, they stop being Greeks
ABOUT ME:
Male, Greek Nationalist, Orthodox Christian, State Capitalist
EU, communism, abortion, Greek/Turkish friendship, NATO, illegal immigration, Globalism, FYROM, gay marriage
Enosis, Megali Idea, Putin, Guns, Nationalism, Equallity, Kurdistan, Assyria
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.74

User avatar
Ayreonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6157
Founded: Jan 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ayreonia » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:10 pm

Garwall wrote:
Ayreonia wrote:Funny, in most of my games the Horde is ridiculously successful in the beginning, but radically deflate between 1550 and 1600.

Never played as Genoa, but merchant republics in general tend to be fun. Except for Novgorod. Fuck Novgorod.


What I meant by Bohemian Empire is that they hit Bohemia around 1430/1440, and eventually lose all of their territory to Bohemia by 1600.

Ahh, I see now.
Images likely to cause widespread offense, such as the swastika, are not permitted as national flags. Please see the One-Stop Rules Shop ("Acceptable Flag Policy").

Photoshopped birds flipping the bird not acceptable.

User avatar
Southern Babylonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Babylonia » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:10 pm

DrakoBlaria wrote:
Southern Babylonia wrote:I've had a game of EU3 going on for quite some time now (started in 1405 because I'm a pussy), and I managed to get out of a war fairly cheap with a super-powerful Bohemia, a super-rich Holsteiner Emperor and a coalition of Muslim states (not the least of which is a giant Khorasan). The year is 1788 or 89, IDK which, and I westernised around 1560. Still rebuilding. I've decided that instead of letting the screenshot show you my empire, I'd draw a more aesthetically pleasing version (of the European part at least) in Paint that doesn't have to rely on province lines, at that it would more probably resemble irl had it existed.
Here ya go.


Justinian would be proud

NS needs a "Like" button.
Impeach the Senate, Legalise Cap and Trade, Prorogations are theft. JACK LAYTON 2011

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08
Alignment: Neutral Good
Yeh: Collectivism, Market Socialism, Environmentalism, Two-State Solution, QUILTBAG rights, abortion rights, permaculture, multiculturalism, CBC, public healthcare, NDP (Canada), SNP.
Meh: most religions, atheism, globalisation, gun rights.
Neh: Corporatocracy, neoliberalism, Maoism, bigotry, evangelism, militant anti-theism, fascism, pollution, Netanyahu, Hamas, tar sands, monoculturalism.
Need help with French? Je peux aider!
Proud Nova Scotian.

User avatar
Garwall
Minister
 
Posts: 3412
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Garwall » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:15 pm

Southern Babylonia wrote:
Garwall wrote:
As the Byzantines, or Ottomans, or...?

Looks like Byzantines to me. Had a fun Byzantines game, but i stopped playing it because my research was dead in the water. Conquering the Mamluks sends your research to shit.

Luckily I got them early and then had a leader who was conveniently good in everything but diplomacy, that's when I got in the westernisation and blasted ahead of the then puny Castille.

And yeah, Byzantines. I hate to say I'm kinda smug.


I did a similar game-- 1403 or 1405 start, sliced up the Turk, and blitz'd the Middle East. The most satisfying moment of the game was converting Mecca to Orthodox Christianity, followed by re-conquering Rome in a very close second.
1 Student
Nationality: Yankee
Religion: Atheist
Ideology: Socialist
Issues: State Capitalism/Full Citizenship
Cash Reserves: ~1$
Revoltrisk: 85%
Militancy: 9
Counsciousness: 12
"For Home and Countrymen!"

-Battle-cry used by Garwall Revolutionaries as they storm the Capitol Building, raising the Rebel Flag.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=132814#p6655830
Above: The Treaty of Belgratz, the Document ratifying the Socialist Party's rise to power in Garwall.

[15:43] <Parhe> For some reason
[15:43] <Parhe> I feel safe whenever Gar is here
[15:43] <Parhe> Not sure why, Garwall always made me feel safe

User avatar
Southern Babylonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Babylonia » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:23 pm

Garwall wrote:
Southern Babylonia wrote:Luckily I got them early and then had a leader who was conveniently good in everything but diplomacy, that's when I got in the westernisation and blasted ahead of the then puny Castille.

And yeah, Byzantines. I hate to say I'm kinda smug.


I did a similar game-- 1403 or 1405 start, sliced up the Turk, and blitz'd the Middle East. The most satisfying moment of the game was converting Mecca to Orthodox Christianity, followed by re-conquering Rome in a very close second.

Lol. I conquered Rome very early, possibly around 1525. I was going to take Mecca and convert it, but Denmark snatched it up and made it Protestant. Damn. At least I have Medina. But restoring the Pentarchy was the best part.
Last edited by Southern Babylonia on Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Impeach the Senate, Legalise Cap and Trade, Prorogations are theft. JACK LAYTON 2011

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08
Alignment: Neutral Good
Yeh: Collectivism, Market Socialism, Environmentalism, Two-State Solution, QUILTBAG rights, abortion rights, permaculture, multiculturalism, CBC, public healthcare, NDP (Canada), SNP.
Meh: most religions, atheism, globalisation, gun rights.
Neh: Corporatocracy, neoliberalism, Maoism, bigotry, evangelism, militant anti-theism, fascism, pollution, Netanyahu, Hamas, tar sands, monoculturalism.
Need help with French? Je peux aider!
Proud Nova Scotian.

User avatar
Dorlania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7974
Founded: Mar 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dorlania » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:32 pm

Garwall wrote:
Dorlania wrote:trying to make perfect again

and immediate decision over Carlists

chose Carlists so no war


I wonder if it's possible to beef Spain's military score up to the point where you can freely breach the Infamy cap with no consequences, and go about re-conquering Spain's former colonies.

The militaries of the South American states, UPCA, and Mexico are a joke, so that's not an issue. The issue is Great Britain and France coming to gangrape you when you pass 25 infamy.

you would be surprised how much smaller countries can hide up their ass
Last edited by Dorlania on Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face--forever"

Sardine World wrote:maintain

when you liberals cant get new technology because all the asians are dead, dont come crying to me



Samozaryadnyastan wrote:Yes, but 9gag has nothing funny or original.
insert/gender/sexuality/political alignment/disorder
the soft parade has now begun~
Unity and Solidarity
Mallorea and Riva should resign

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:25 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Let's look at it's perks.

-Dirt poor
-One province country and isn't even a European one at that.
-Tiny population
-Only terrain is mountain, meaning smaller pop and overall everythings worse
-Borders the hungry UK
-Part of the pathetically tiny Nepali culture group

Why even bother being a country at that point?


Somebody has probably done a WC with it. Though honestly, the NA tribes are probably worse. Anybody who declares war on you can literally just walk across your country, steal all of your provinces and annex you in about a week, and the only way to stop this being the case is to spend decades with a border with a nation with vastly superior troops, an urge to conquer all of your things, a free CB on you, that you can't do the same to. Still didn't stop people doing world conquests with them though.



Hell, for a significant while (most of the time IN was the latest build, IIRC) the fastest WC ever had been done with bleeding Mantua.

Garwall wrote:
Dorlania wrote:trying to make perfect again

and immediate decision over Carlists

chose Carlists so no war


I wonder if it's possible to beef Spain's military score up to the point where you can freely breach the Infamy cap with no consequences, and go about re-conquering Spain's former colonies.

The militaries of the South American states, UPCA, and Mexico are a joke, so that's not an issue. The issue is Great Britain and France coming to gangrape you when you pass 25 infamy.


It's entirely possible, yes. About 100-200 provinces is the tipping point, though that depends heavily on how quickly you get there and how good those provinces are. Beyond that, there isn't much anybody can do to stop you, and you can expect your rebels to be the single largest threats in the world (seriously, you can get rebel doomstacks into the hundreds of thousands that obliterate everybody else's armies. The wackamole gets really painful before the end).
Last edited by Salandriagado on Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:33 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31245
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:03 pm

Okay then, Britain, glad you're my ally, but I am NOT inviting you to the party with Mexico anymore. I want Mexico all to myself . . .
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
United Dependencies
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13659
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby United Dependencies » Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:08 pm

Does a set of all sets contain itself?



Oh the company paradox.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.

Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

This is Nationstates we're here to help

Are you a native or resident of North Carolina?

User avatar
Southern Babylonia
Minister
 
Posts: 2323
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Southern Babylonia » Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:56 am

Religions in my Byzantine Empire, ca 1799.
Brown is Orthodox, Dark Green is Sunni, Light Green is Shiite, Gold is Catholic, Dark Blue is Protestant, Light Blue is Reformed.
The province borders aren't quite accurate, and it only shows the European part of my Empire, but it looks nicer and more realistic.
Also, really glad I just basically stuck an arrow through the knee of the Giant Bohemian Empire.
In 1807, after crushing Bohemia another time, attacking the Hordes and PUing Castille...
Last edited by Southern Babylonia on Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Impeach the Senate, Legalise Cap and Trade, Prorogations are theft. JACK LAYTON 2011

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -8.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08
Alignment: Neutral Good
Yeh: Collectivism, Market Socialism, Environmentalism, Two-State Solution, QUILTBAG rights, abortion rights, permaculture, multiculturalism, CBC, public healthcare, NDP (Canada), SNP.
Meh: most religions, atheism, globalisation, gun rights.
Neh: Corporatocracy, neoliberalism, Maoism, bigotry, evangelism, militant anti-theism, fascism, pollution, Netanyahu, Hamas, tar sands, monoculturalism.
Need help with French? Je peux aider!
Proud Nova Scotian.

User avatar
Bralia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31245
Founded: Mar 07, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Bralia » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:17 pm

I'm going to say it again, here, where it's more applicable: Damn conservatives cramped my style. >.<. I accidentally ruined the trigger for A House Divided. I'm going to have to re-do the entire game . . .
Romantic slut. Self-deprecating egotist. Benevolent communist.

User avatar
Jinos
Minister
 
Posts: 2424
Founded: Oct 10, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Jinos » Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:45 pm

Doing an Egypt game and going for uniting the Arab Union. So far I am still an Ottoman Vassal, Oriental Crisis has not started, I am hoping the event is delayed long enough for me to pass one military reform. If I can do that, then I'll create a Casus Belli for independence and start the war on my terms. France luckily seems to be trying to get me into their sphere. Which I would love to happen so they support me against any other GPs that side with the Turks, and so they don't try to take the Levnant.

One other thing that surprised me. The Peru-Bolivian Confederation survived. No interference from me. That almost never happens!
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: -5.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.97

Map of the Grand Commonwealth

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:04 pm

Man, I love playing as Castille. Especially because the nobles of Leon and Galicia wanted me as their king, so within 15 years I had three kingdoms under my rule and I have conquered two sultanates. :3

User avatar
Wolfenium
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10593
Founded: Jan 17, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Wolfenium » Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:24 pm

Napkiraly wrote:Man, I love playing as Castille. Especially because the nobles of Leon and Galicia wanted me as their king, so within 15 years I had three kingdoms under my rule and I have conquered two sultanates. :3


Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.
Name: Wolfenium| Demonym: Wolfener/Wolfen| Tech Level: MT/PMT/FanTech (main timeline) or FT/FanTech
Factbook (under revamping): MT | PT
Characters: Imperial Registry of Houses (PT: Historical Archives)
Embassies: Wolfenium's Diplomatic Quarters - Now open to Embassies and Consulates
National Symbols (Applies for both MT/PMT and FT): Flag (Elaborate)|Anthem


/人 ‿‿ 人\ { Make a contract with me, and save me from the Homu-devil! )

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am

Wolfenium wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Man, I love playing as Castille. Especially because the nobles of Leon and Galicia wanted me as their king, so within 15 years I had three kingdoms under my rule and I have conquered two sultanates. :3


Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.

Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?
Last edited by Napkiraly on Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:30 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Wolfenium wrote:
Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.

Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Destroy the other two titles. It won't really give much benefit though, unless your favoured heir might not get elected.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:20 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Wolfenium wrote:
Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.

Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Just form the Empire of Hispania.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Onekawa-Nukanor
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Sep 24, 2009
New York Times Democracy

Postby Onekawa-Nukanor » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:39 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Wolfenium wrote:
Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.

Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Crush them with fire and steel

*nods*
A NEW ZEALANDER

ALL BLACKS SUPPORTER


When refering to me ICly, please use the proper term Ngāti Onekawa-Nukanor, not Ngāti of Onekawa-Nukanor. Thank you.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:31 pm

Czechanada wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Just form the Empire of Hispania.


Yeah, this should be your long term goal. If you haven't done it already, try to conquer the other non-Muslim kingdoms such as Navarra and Aragon. Move fast against the Muslims as well though, because countries like France have a tendency to wage holy wars in Spain.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:15 pm

Chestaan wrote:
Czechanada wrote:
Just form the Empire of Hispania.


Yeah, this should be your long term goal. If you haven't done it already, try to conquer the other non-Muslim kingdoms such as Navarra and Aragon. Move fast against the Muslims as well though, because countries like France have a tendency to wage holy wars in Spain.

Currently in the process of conquering Navarra. Then will probably focus on the Reconquesta, Napkiraly style, before finishing of Aragon which isn't a threat.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:55 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Wolfenium wrote:
Just be sure to change the succession laws, or at worst, destroy the other titles. Gavelkind will carve your realm apart.

Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Seniority is good for unifying titles. Make sure you don't have too many old people around though, or you'll be in for a few decades of continual succession problems.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:07 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Aye I did. Switched to elective for the time being. Kept the other nobles happy and it worked out fine. Going to focus my new king on building up his good image to switch to high crown authority so I can use primogeniture.

Is there anyway I can unite all three kingdoms under one crown at this moment?


Seniority is good for unifying titles. Make sure you don't have too many old people around though, or you'll be in for a few decades of continual succession problems.

That's a bit of a problem since my two kings so far have had a tendancy to produce a lot of children without a lot of space inbetween.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:19 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Seniority is good for unifying titles. Make sure you don't have too many old people around though, or you'll be in for a few decades of continual succession problems.

That's a bit of a problem since my two kings so far have had a tendancy to produce a lot of children without a lot of space inbetween.

Thats why you have assassination.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Arts & Fiction

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement

Remove ads