I was going to say space america because <10 people have any other kind of accent that ive heard.
Advertisement

by New England and The Maritimes » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:07 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Oterro » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:10 pm
Raeyh wrote:It's the military, not a corporation.

by Galla- » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:10 pm
Fashiontopia wrote:Look don't come here talking bad about Americans, that will get you cussed out faster than relativity.
Besides: Most posters in this thread are Americans, and others who are non-Americans have no problems co-existing so shut that trap...

by New England and The Maritimes » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:22 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by The Matthew Islands » Fri Mar 23, 2012 3:24 pm
Galla- wrote:America still exists in ME3-verse, at least until the Reapers come and start leveling the earth. >:
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Divair » Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:21 pm
Galla- wrote:Norstal wrote:Crashing into a planet creates more force doesn't it?
Well, I guess it's plausible. Just bothers me he doesn't get fixed in Synthesis.
I'm wondering why he didn't get the "Heavy bone weave" thing come ME2.
Surely Cerberus would have been able to afford whatever the surgery cost.
I'm also wondering how he managed to get into the Alliance military, no matter how good a pilot he is, with that kind of disease. Does the Alliance just not reject people for medical reasons or something?

by Grand America » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:16 am
Ganos Lao wrote:Grand America wrote:I loved the Mass Effect Three ending. It seemed to me that Bioware knew for a fact, like I did, and like I hope we all did, that such a conflict as the one we're facing cannot ending with a happily ever after; It's a war, and not only that, it's a genocidal war. It's like saying Gears of War Three should end with a happily ever after. We're facing the strongest enemy we've ever seen, and we expect to see everything be all right?
It's still very interesting to note that the endings' defenders have to keep on calling anyone who disliked them "people who just wanted a happy ending," when it's obviously not true at all. I personally would've wanted the option of having a wide spectrum of endings, depending on how you did during your playthrough, ranging from the Reapers winning if you messed up way too much to the ultimate good ending if you excelled too much. People hate the endings because they clash with the overall tone of the series, contradict pre-release statements made during the game's promotion, and retroactively have invalidated the series for people - I mean, why did they need Sovereign or Saren or the Geth?
The Catalyst could've just kicked back, relaxed, and let his solution proceed with the mere flick of a wrist. The indoctrination Theory is a load of crap. It's just an elaborate coping mechanism designed by people with buyers' remorse, that they invested all this time into the franchise to be given as little attention to their wishes as Bioware gave to Tali's looks. Besides, if the Indoctrination Theory is true, Bioware still sold us an incomplete game and lied to us about it providing closure upon reaching the ending you attained.
Not only that, but if the endings are realistic just because they're set within the context of a genocidal conflict, why do your squad mates teleport on the Normandy? How does green light make people half-synthetic? Why can't the Reapers win if you mess up too much? This is war, right? So naturally you should be able to lose the war as well as win it.
The endings are just the culmination of Bioware's attempts to create lots of speculation instead of abiding by what they had promised, and it backfiring on them epically. That's all there is to it.

by Grand America » Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:18 am
Galla- wrote:Norstal wrote:Crashing into a planet creates more force doesn't it?
Well, I guess it's plausible. Just bothers me he doesn't get fixed in Synthesis.
I'm wondering why he didn't get the "Heavy bone weave" thing come ME2.
Surely Cerberus would have been able to afford whatever the surgery cost.
I'm also wondering how he managed to get into the Alliance military, no matter how good a pilot he is, with that kind of disease. Does the Alliance just not reject people for medical reasons or something?

by Northern Dominus » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:09 pm
Grand America wrote:
First, sorry for the long delay. I've been busy.
Second, I'm going to begin responding:
OK, yes, I know that's not the only reason. I said this myself somewhere after the quote you posted. And I'm not calling anyone who disliked it did so because of those reasons, I'm saying it's one of the reasons I heard. I'm still trying to capture all of them to be able to respond accordingly.
Interesting, an ending where the Reapers win. I, myself, had thought that was going to be one of the endings. And while I do agree that such an ending would have been a very satisfactory addition to the overall game, I do not disagree with their current endings. Primarily because I don't want to lose. Sure, there are those that want to, and you can have Earth get destroyed, but, overall, the war is "won," if you considering having millions of aliens stranded on Earth with no Mass Relays to use to get back to their worlds a win. And even worse if Earth gets destroyed; all of them just die....
Edit: Too much awesome to simply quote, it would do it injustice...plus I'm sure one or two curmudgeons would get irritated..

by The Murray Dynasty » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:31 pm

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:32 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Tergnitz » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:32 pm

by New England and The Maritimes » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:33 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Norstal » Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:33 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by The Steel Magnolia » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:02 pm
Norstal wrote:http://consumerist.com/2012/03/the-8-remaining-worst-company-in-america-contenders-are-an-elite-bunch.html
Voting for EA might make our voices heard. Maybe.

by Hittanryan » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:18 pm

by Genivaria » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:50 pm

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:58 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Raeyh » Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:35 pm
Norstal wrote:http://consumerist.com/2012/03/the-8-remaining-worst-company-in-america-contenders-are-an-elite-bunch.html
Voting for EA might make our voices heard. Maybe.

by New Conglomerate » Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:48 pm

by Norstal » Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:52 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Vjiay » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:03 am

by Imperial isa » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:56 am

by Sorratsin » Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:01 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The first Galactic Republic
Advertisement