Alright
12.5
7.5
Advertisement
by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:52 am
by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:55 am
Yoite wrote:Yup, no decision is final, but you can move them back to
15
5
for now because I hate decimals.
by New England and The Maritimes » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:01 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Alexlantis » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:07 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:You are Alex, NSG's writer and lead procrastinator. *nods* :P
by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:08 pm
Alexlantis wrote:...I like decimals...
by Maineiacs » Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:30 pm
by Yoite » Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:04 pm
Maineiacs wrote:We have until the 1st, right? I'll get it on the thread it a couple of days. 900+ words and counting.
by Norstal » Sat Dec 17, 2011 6:46 pm
Yoite wrote:Have we established how the judges will be evaluating the entries?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Yoite » Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:07 pm
Norstal wrote:Yoite wrote:Have we established how the judges will be evaluating the entries?
Blerg, I used to have a scoring sheet for IB English for literary criticism. Now I can't find it.
I think CM's scoring system is a bit confusing, but I think I can fix it. The description of the setting should be the same as 25 or at least 20. Creativity is vague, so eliminate that category. Spelling is included with grammar. Everything else should be fine.
by Alexlantis » Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:41 pm
Yoite wrote:Norstal wrote:Blerg, I used to have a scoring sheet for IB English for literary criticism. Now I can't find it.
I think CM's scoring system is a bit confusing, but I think I can fix it. The description of the setting should be the same as 25 or at least 20. Creativity is vague, so eliminate that category. Spelling is included with grammar. Everything else should be fine.
Creativity = Originality
Individuality-ness wrote:You are Alex, NSG's writer and lead procrastinator. *nods* :P
by Alexlantis » Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:51 pm
Individuality-ness wrote:You are Alex, NSG's writer and lead procrastinator. *nods* :P
by Norstal » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:09 pm
Yoite wrote:Norstal wrote:Blerg, I used to have a scoring sheet for IB English for literary criticism. Now I can't find it.
I think CM's scoring system is a bit confusing, but I think I can fix it. The description of the setting should be the same as 25 or at least 20. Creativity is vague, so eliminate that category. Spelling is included with grammar. Everything else should be fine.
Creativity = Originality
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:54 pm
Norstal wrote:Blerg, I used to have a scoring sheet for IB English for literary criticism. Now I can't find it.
I think CM's scoring system is a bit confusing, but I think I can fix it. The description of the setting should be the same as 25 or at least 20. Creativity is vague, so eliminate that category. Spelling is included with grammar. Everything else should be fine.
by Norstal » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:57 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Norstal wrote:Blerg, I used to have a scoring sheet for IB English for literary criticism. Now I can't find it.
I think CM's scoring system is a bit confusing, but I think I can fix it. The description of the setting should be the same as 25 or at least 20. Creativity is vague, so eliminate that category. Spelling is included with grammar. Everything else should be fine.
Setting IS worth 20 in the last one. I set out four proposals. I also don't see how creativity is vague.
Characters - 25
Plot - 25
Setting - 15
Creativity - 15
Style - 15
Grammar - 5
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Manahakatouki » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:00 pm
by Norstal » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:02 pm
Manahakatouki wrote:I suppose it could mean general creativity/originality which can be easily observed...
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:04 pm
Norstal wrote:As for creativity, well, why couldn't you be creative with the plot/setting/characters/style? I mean, if someone were creative with one aspect of their story and not with another, it seems that it would hurt their creativity and that would be unfair.
by Yoite » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:06 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Norstal wrote:As for creativity, well, why couldn't you be creative with the plot/setting/characters/style? I mean, if someone were creative with one aspect of their story and not with another, it seems that it would hurt their creativity and that would be unfair.
What else other than the plot/setting/characters/style could one be creative with?
Could they send it via envelope instead of post? (Or perhaps, by post instead of post? )
If someone were to be creative in one aspect of their story and not another, then that reflects a very real weakness of the story. If it's still well-executed, then one shouldn't take away from the character score, or the plot score, or the setting score, as that would be unfair, much in the way that you object to taking away from the creativity score. If, however, a story lacks originality (Not necessarily plagiarism, mind, just unoriginal), then it can come off as trite in parts without necessarily reflecting a weakness in any of the other scoring areas.
by Norstal » Sat Dec 17, 2011 9:16 pm
Yoite wrote:I believe he is still here, he just posted on . . .wait me?
Conserative Morality wrote:Norstal wrote:As for creativity, well, why couldn't you be creative with the plot/setting/characters/style? I mean, if someone were creative with one aspect of their story and not with another, it seems that it would hurt their creativity and that would be unfair.
What else other than the plot/setting/characters/style could one be creative with?
Could they send it via envelope instead of post? (Or perhaps, by post instead of post? )
If someone were to be creative in one aspect of their story and not another, then that reflects a very real weakness of the story. If it's still well-executed, then one shouldn't take away from the character score, or the plot score, or the setting score, as that would be unfair, much in the way that you object to taking away from the creativity score. If, however, a story lacks originality (Not necessarily plagiarism, mind, just unoriginal), then it can come off as trite in parts without necessarily reflecting a weakness in any of the other scoring areas.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement