Archinstinct wrote:Sedgistan wrote:There's absolutely nothing wrong with a member of the Pacific / the NPO (whether in NS or other games) being on the site staff. In fact, were we to need more Moderators, there's a couple of other Pacificans who I think would do the job excellently.
If I had any doubt at all, Archinstinct/Parxland opposing someone is a vote of confidence in my books.
Now move on and judge our new site staff on their actions as staff members (which so far have been exemplary).
I'm serious, and this is disturbing to read. Have you not read about the behavior of their community members on other games that have been condoned, or their affiliations? I'm pretty sure some activity the whole npo community supported on their website was illegal. The same website they link to on this game, that they invite players on this game to? Does this mean I can start breaking the laws on this website and Max Barry will cover for me or is the pacificans just a special exception to the rules?
And yeah, I actually *do* have evidence of to back up what i'm saying, provided to me by former gov of the new pacific order community. I can link the current government of npo's leadership to breaking the site rules at one point in recent years.
I'm sorry Santheres, but reading that post coming from the moderation team is just a big 'what the fuck' moment to me. Unless somebody else from moderation team wants to post something outlandish, this is my last post here. I don't want to threadjack, so I'll make another thread for the purpose of post evidence .
Archinstinct wrote:Sedgistan wrote:Unsubstantiated claims that a staff member has a tangential relation to an in-game group that has a relation to another another group in another game that apparently broke some rules on another website are about as useful as knowing how many degrees of separation they have from Kevin Bacon.
If you have anything of real note and concern, i.e. of rules violations within our jurisdiction, or serious allegations of misconduct about a staff member, put your money where your mouth is and GHR it with actual evidence, not just wild speculation.
Otherwise:
"File a GHR about it" so the pacifican technical moderators disregard all the rules about privacy involving GHR reports and inform NPO leadership about it, who in turn will use the information to attack the person possibly IRL who gave me the evidence. I think I'll just email Max the evidence directly.
It seems that these accusations range outside the bounds of "They have done something wrong in this game" to "They have committed RL crimes," considering the specific use of "I can start breaking the laws," "use the information to attack the person possibly IRL..." etc. I'm not sure if they were originally read as in-game, but I can't find a reading where that is the case.
I understand if it's borderline but imo it seems that these are specific, weaselly-worded allegations to potentially try to claim that wasn't the original intent. I can't imagine that claiming that a region would attack someone in real life is kosher.




