BEEstreetz wrote:Don't stop with the hypotheticals because of this flame pls. I'd love to see more cosmology-universality ideas like the Endless one, most of us do.
This is the second time the same poster has endeavoured to accuse posters of animosity in the same thread. Twice seems like a pattern and an attempt to cause trouble.
EDIT: Same poster, different thread: has also been flamebaiting themselves in another thread, calling those who disagree with them "overconfident and dumb" (emphases with underlining mine; emphasis on the second in original); a couple of days ago, but hasn't been reported yet I believe:
BEEstreetz wrote:
Egoism is based and those criticizing it clearly have absolutely 0 idea about Johann Caspar Schmidt, his transformation into Max Stirner and have either not read or aren't... mature enough to read his essays, especially the main work.
1. Yeah because being among the Young Hegelians, Johann definitely didn't take the individualist stance with collectivism in mind.
2. I can imagine you in RL being what you've described.
3. Me.
4. A racist? (。_。) ...Once again JUG you seem to attract the...most confident but primary-school educated kind of people to these, somehow.
BEEstreetz wrote:The United Penguin Commonwealth wrote:how about instead of saying “people who disagree are dumb”, you actually support your opinion with logical arguments?
Because, Moderator-Pen, people who disagree with me on this topic are overconfident and dumb. I can't have a discussion with people who clearly haven't read source material or the person they're trying to defame.
I can't do anything with my "arguments" if they have no idea what they're talking about. All I can say is: you're really overly confident about something you know nothing about, look it up, study the material, THEN make an opinion.
/Hornet Out.
