Page 1 of 1

[R]flaming/baiting, abortion thread

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:54 am
by Necroghastia
Hankiana wrote:
Fauzjhia wrote:
Polls do not have voice, they do not vote, they have no influence. Sorry to be pessimist
the only correct is a STRONG vote blue in the next election, but that might be nipped by gerrymandering and false allegations of cheating...

the only correct backlash is a strong movement to retake the supreme court and get politics out of justice. That would be real backlash.

Sounds like someone isn't playing with a full deck... Like many, many others in this thread.

PostPosted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 11:20 am
by Farnhamia

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 12:33 pm
by Necroghastia
Michel Meilleur wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:He said, as he blatantly and shamelessly quote edited.

I quote edited because I added back the second part of the post you purposefully removed to change the point I was making? You know that it's not allowed by the rules to do what you're trying to do, right?

trollnaming

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:52 pm
by Korovan
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=491265&p=39196094#p39196094

Necroghastia wrote:
Michel Meilleur wrote:I'm denying another human's humanity by... Saying that personhood and its nebulous definition isn't enough to deny someone's humanity? :eyebrow:
Quite the take you have, I sure would love to hear your reasoning because I ain't getting it lmfao

Michel Meilleur wrote:A toddler has yet to gain personhood. A mentally deficient child has yet to gain personhood..


looks like malicious quote editing since omitting the second half of the message changes the narrative of what the other person is saying. Granted that could of been an unintentional mistake on the poster's part. A better way to respond to a specific part of a post is to highlight the part you're responding to avoid any issues

PostPosted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:04 pm
by Necroghastia
Korovan wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=491265&p=39196094#p39196094

Necroghastia wrote:


looks like malicious quote editing since omitting the second half of the message changes the narrative of what the other person is saying. Granted that could of been an unintentional mistake on the poster's part. A better way to respond to a specific part of a post is to highlight the part you're responding to avoid any issues

I absolutely was not changing MM's narrative in any way. He asked where he denied another person's humanity, and I showed him precisely where he did.