Cekoviu wrote:Proctopeo wrote:this reads as "I know my argument is bad, but I'm going to accuse the others of being too stupid to understand it instead of working to make it coherent"
you aren't getting this. it's literally Not An Argument. that entire portion of my post is not supposed to be interpreted as an argument. it's an illustration of the logical flow between principles with the express purpose being entertainment, which i literally said there.you are right on one thing, though - this massive disagreement is due to wildly irreconcilable differences in beliefs and worldviews. you believe in an eon-spanning global conspiracy to oppress you,
are you guys like actually stupid or are you intentionally wildly misconstruing the nature of the patriarchy because i genuinely cannot tell which one it isand you demand massive privileges to compensate.
god, the window you guys unwittingly provide into the male worldview with this shit. you people are genuinely are so fucking sick in the head, you so hate the idea of treating women as anything more than sex and food machines, that you think someone advocating for ensuring women have safe and free access to healthcare, are treated properly in the workplace, are safe doing the same basic things as men, and are not raped on camera for an audience of millions of sex addicted freaks is "DEMANDING MASSIVE PRIVILEGES". every time one of you posts, i become just a little bit more misandrist as it becomes more and more terrifyingly clear to me how genuinely, incomprehensibly sociopathic and scummy men are when confronted with issues that affect anyone other than other men.gallo, ostro, and I all believe broadly in actual equality (though I'm sure we differ on several details).
or to put it more simply, you're a supremacist, but nobody else here is
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAIt's really not a "task" to read Ostro's posts? they're like, marginally more difficult than any standard text wall, if that.
it's not a "task" or whatever, sure, but it's very unpleasant and just not something i want to do, solely because of his formatting and writing style. again, i have no issues reading what gallo writes because even though gallo is generally writing a bunch of bull shit that i disagree with just like ostro, he always writes it in an articulate and easy to read manner.reading them might require you to think critically, which is something you definitely don't want to do
this coming from proctopeoedit: now that I've thought about it for a bit, radical feminism is pretty much just inceldom but for women
femceldom is its own thing and there is some overlap between femcels and radical feminism but they aren't fundamentally linked, speaking as some1 who is both but for separate reasons (i.e., i would still believe in radical feminism if god magically dropped a boyfriend into my lap) & who knows a lot of representatives of both groups. a lot of radical feminists and possibly even the majority either have a boyfriend/husband or are lesbians, and they've got no interest in arguing about how evil men are because of not wanting to sex them like incels do. radfems' criticism of men and patriarchy is fundamentally rooted in different motivations from incels' criticism of women and "gynocracy".
Bolded the main points of contention.