Advertisement
by Radicalania » Sat May 15, 2021 11:43 am
by Portog » Sat May 15, 2021 11:44 am
Refuge Isle wrote:CoraSpia wrote:How can we be proud of an environment that censors things just to protect people from things they might be offended by?
Political debate is great until we get to one predicated on what people have the right to be people. Thriving communities are great until you get to one that's built around the idea of oppressing demographics. Hatred is a learned ideology, and NationStates need not be a part of the recruitment apparatus of one that is inherently harmful to others.
by The Reformed American Republic » Sat May 15, 2021 11:46 am
Wymondham wrote:CoraSpia wrote:How can we be proud of an environment that censors things just to protect people from things they might be offended by?
There's a difference between "deleting things because people are offended" and "deleting things because they represent an ideology that did the Holocaust", I'm sure even you will agree GVH that there are perhaps, just some, minor differences there
Portog wrote:Refuge Isle wrote:Political debate is great until we get to one predicated on what people have the right to be people. Thriving communities are great until you get to one that's built around the idea of oppressing demographics. Hatred is a learned ideology, and NationStates need not be a part of the recruitment apparatus of one that is inherently harmful to others.
So by definition we should also ban stalinists and maoists as they hate the kulaks and rich upper class
by Noble Titans » Sat May 15, 2021 11:46 am
CoraSpia wrote:Noble Titans wrote:
I think it’s time for this step. To many people died because of this belief. Most of the fascist communities I’ve seen on NS are either toxic, praising a leader who’s name I won’t mention, or causing silly drama. The mods are trying to flush out the problem makers, and create a better environment we all can be proud of.
How can we be proud of an environment that censors things just to protect people from things they might be offended by?
by Portog » Sat May 15, 2021 11:48 am
Noble Titans wrote:CoraSpia wrote:How can we be proud of an environment that censors things just to protect people from things they might be offended by?
Because it’s stopping people from spewing propaganda that exterminated so many people because they weren’t good enough. I mean it’s been a common theme for those communities. Causing trouble, and skewing in toxicity. I’m surprised you aren’t supportive of this change GVH.
by Wymondham » Sat May 15, 2021 11:48 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:Wymondham wrote:There's a difference between "deleting things because people are offended" and "deleting things because they represent an ideology that did the Holocaust", I'm sure even you will agree GVH that there are perhaps, just some, minor differences there
It's actually pointless to do this, as all one has do do is replace Nazi with National Socialist (which means the same thing), unless the moderators plan to ban the latter term as well. All that occurred here was the banning of a word.Portog wrote:So by definition we should also ban stalinists and maoists as they hate the kulaks and rich upper class
That's what I do not like about Gameplay. They go after Nazis for wanting to violate people's rights, all while showing solidarity with those who want to do something similar because they're on the left.
by CoraSpia » Sat May 15, 2021 11:48 am
Noble Titans wrote:CoraSpia wrote:How can we be proud of an environment that censors things just to protect people from things they might be offended by?
Because it’s stopping people from spewing propaganda that exterminated so many people because they weren’t good enough. I mean it’s been a common theme for those communities. Causing trouble, and skewing in toxicity. I’m surprised you aren’t supportive of this change GVH.
by Outer Sparta » Sat May 15, 2021 11:49 am
Alphazi wrote:So I see, all nation with the world Nazi are DEATED. Now bad when your just innocent.
by Katganistan » Sat May 15, 2021 11:50 am
The Reformed American Republic wrote:It's actually pointless to do this, as all one has do do is replace Nazi with National Socialist (which means the same thing), unless the moderators plan to ban the latter term as well. All that occurred here was the banning of a word.
by The Reformed American Republic » Sat May 15, 2021 11:52 am
Katganistan wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:It's actually pointless to do this, as all one has do do is replace Nazi with National Socialist (which means the same thing), unless the moderators plan to ban the latter term as well. All that occurred here was the banning of a word.
Incorrect. If you slap a new paint job on it and file off the serial numbers, it's still banned.
by Anarchisticstan » Sat May 15, 2021 11:53 am
by Qvait » Sat May 15, 2021 11:54 am
by Wymondham » Sat May 15, 2021 11:55 am
Anarchisticstan wrote:While it is good news, can deleted nations who had the Nazi name/region nazi name appeal as long as their name is changed to something appropriate?
by Reploid Productions » Sat May 15, 2021 11:55 am
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
by Anarchisticstan » Sat May 15, 2021 11:56 am
by The Python » Sat May 15, 2021 11:58 am
by Reventus Koth » Sat May 15, 2021 11:58 am
Portog wrote:The best way to destroy nazisim is by confronting it, not by banning it
Xanthal wrote:Only raiders can win in this war- a defender can keep them from winning one region, one update at a time, but there will always be the next region, the next update, and the next, forever.
by The Reformed American Republic » Sat May 15, 2021 11:59 am
Reploid Productions wrote:The Reformed American Republic wrote:I said "...unless you plan to ban the latter term as well." Is that what you've done? Is "National Socialist" also a banned term?
It's not on the auto-block list, but if Nazi-style nations try to use "National Socialist" as a cover while still promoting the same sort of malicious material, they'll get treated the same way.
by Alcala-Cordel » Sat May 15, 2021 12:00 pm
by Aenglaland » Sat May 15, 2021 12:01 pm
by Qvait » Sat May 15, 2021 12:02 pm
Alcala-Cordel wrote:Nice!
On a side note, will there be any changes to Nazi nations and regions not containing the word?
by Wymondham » Sat May 15, 2021 12:03 pm
Reventus Koth wrote:Portog wrote:The best way to destroy nazisim is by confronting it, not by banning it
For anyone that needs to read this: an argument like this tends to pop up every time the bad actors among us are "censored" and no longer allowed to openly air their vile beliefs. It can be tempting to agree with it, to wonder if your ideals aren't actually righteous if they can't hold up in the court of public opinion over and over again.
Don't buy into it. The targets of Nazism should not have to justify their own existence time and time again in the public space. This is a solved issue in our society, and we should treat it like such. Nazis do not belong anywhere in a just world, so we should not tolerate them on this website. That's it. There's nothing more that needs to be said. Their disgusting ideology does not become any less wrong because their believers are loud and visible.
I'm glad Max Barry and whoever else calls the shots from above have made this decision, and I hope that we can see more rulings in this direction in the future. Nazis do not belong on this website full of young and impressionable players who for years have been charmed by these malevolent actors.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Improper Classifications, Telbnis, Trivalve
Advertisement