Page 1 of 1

[R] Possible inappropriate post in PruChu.net/ thread

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:28 am
by The Islands of Versilia
Swayh Prijan wrote:
Prince Iskandar III of Swayh PrijanShah City25/04/2021

@Tensei'in Sumire (天城院 菫)
You over 16, baby?

REPLY


The post here was made in reply to this post by Fuso-:

Fuso- wrote:
Tensei'in Sumire (天城院 菫) Kyōto 23 April 2021

@Lord Ambassador Aldaes Dfragre
Sir, I'm a student in my second year of high school...
Now move along before I pull a crime buzzer.


REPLY


The post by Swayh Prijan made me uncomfortable and I thought to report it given the user’s history.

Here is the link to the post by him: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=498952&p=38590296&hilit=Sumire#p38590296

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:32 am
by Swayh Prijan
Which rule am I supposedly breaking?

Could you please specify?

Characters flirting is not against the rules.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:37 am
by The Islands of Versilia
Swayh Prijan wrote:Which rule am I supposedly breaking?

Could you please specify?

Characters flirting is not against the rules.


The post was concerning to me and others because of your history, which includes the sexualisation of minors in roleplay and general uncomfortable nature of multiple marriage threads you’ve made in the past that in particular outlined young women (often at or just above the age of 17, i.e. a minor) as desired applicants.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:40 am
by Swayh Prijan
The Islands of Versilia wrote:
Swayh Prijan wrote:Which rule am I supposedly breaking?

Could you please specify?

Characters flirting is not against the rules.


The post was concerning to me and others because of your history, which includes the sexualisation of minors in roleplay and general uncomfortable nature of multiple marriage threads you’ve made in the past that in particular outlined young women (often at or just above the age of 17, i.e. a minor) as desired applicants.


Can you specify which rule?

Also the age of majority depends by nation and is not necessarily 18 in Swayh Prijan.

If your argument rests on laws of some real world countries all of NS would be banned as it sandbox for our own thoughts not what actual governments decide to do.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:46 am
by Greater Cesnica
Swayh Prijan wrote:
The Islands of Versilia wrote:
The post was concerning to me and others because of your history, which includes the sexualisation of minors in roleplay and general uncomfortable nature of multiple marriage threads you’ve made in the past that in particular outlined young women (often at or just above the age of 17, i.e. a minor) as desired applicants.


Can you specify which rule?

Also the age of majority depends by nation and is not necessarily 18 in Swayh Prijan.

If your argument rests on laws of some real world countries all of NS would be banned as it sandbox for our own thoughts not what actual governments decide to do.

/notamod /nottryingtospammoderation

The age of majority for NS purposes is 18. Period.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:46 am
by Swayh Prijan
Greater Cesnica wrote:
Swayh Prijan wrote:
Can you specify which rule?

Also the age of majority depends by nation and is not necessarily 18 in Swayh Prijan.

If your argument rests on laws of some real world countries all of NS would be banned as it sandbox for our own thoughts not what actual governments decide to do.

/notamod /nottryingtospammoderation

The age of majority for NS purposes is 18. Period.


Where do the rules say that?

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:47 am
by Swayh Prijan
Greater Cesnica wrote:
Swayh Prijan wrote:
Can you specify which rule?

Also the age of majority depends by nation and is not necessarily 18 in Swayh Prijan.

If your argument rests on laws of some real world countries all of NS would be banned as it sandbox for our own thoughts not what actual governments decide to do.

/notamod /nottryingtospammoderation

The age of majority for NS purposes is 18. Period.

In which case the mods should look at this:https://forum.nationstates.net/search.php?keywords=16&t=240839&sf=msgonly

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:48 am
by Greater Cesnica
Swayh Prijan wrote:
Greater Cesnica wrote:/notamod /nottryingtospammoderation

The age of majority for NS purposes is 18. Period.


Where do the rules say that?

viewtopic.php?p=16394962#p16394962

"Yes, we know several countries have their age of consent at 16 (or even lower in some places.) Our bar is set at 18, full stop."

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:49 am
by Jarvikan
Swayh Prijan wrote:
The Islands of Versilia wrote:
The post was concerning to me and others because of your history, which includes the sexualisation of minors in roleplay and general uncomfortable nature of multiple marriage threads you’ve made in the past that in particular outlined young women (often at or just above the age of 17, i.e. a minor) as desired applicants.


Can you specify which rule?

Also the age of majority depends by nation and is not necessarily 18 in Swayh Prijan.

If your argument rests on laws of some real world countries all of NS would be banned as it sandbox for our own thoughts not what actual governments decide to do.

PG-13 rule.Sharifstan got deleted after breaking this.It is the reason porn spammers are so bad as they violate perhaps the most important rule on here

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:50 am
by Lamoni
Swayh Prijan

That "You over 16, baby?" comment of yours almost crosses the line, in regards to both the NS PG-13 policy, as well as rules against Offensive Material. Please review the rules before your next post. iLoom.


Also, this is not a debate thread. We won't warn anyone for spamming moderation (this time), but do keep that in mind.

PostPosted: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:54 am
by The Islands of Versilia
Lamoni wrote:Swayh Prijan

That "You over 16, baby?" comment of yours almost crosses the line, in regards to both the NS PG-13 policy, as well as rules against Offensive Material. Please review the rules before your next post. iLoom.


Also, this is not a debate thread. We won't warn anyone for spamming moderation (this time), but do keep that in mind.


Thanks for ruling on this.