[Q]What's with mods doing the reporting?
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:58 am
I've seen 2 moderation topics, where the reporter is a mod, is the mod asking for approval to do action or something?
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Sedgistan wrote:If a mod is already involved in a thread, or otherwise feels it would not be appropriate for them to rule for whatever reason, then they can file a report the same way as any other player.
Sedgistan wrote:I'm rewording the same thing again, because the question has already been answered. A mod may file a report like any other player, in circumstances when it would not be appropriate for them to act as a mod.
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs?
Torisakia wrote:Sedgistan wrote:I'm rewording the same thing again, because the question has already been answered. A mod may file a report like any other player, in circumstances when it would not be appropriate for them to act as a mod.
This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.
No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?
Luna Amore wrote:Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.
No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?
One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.
Luna Amore wrote:Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.
No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?
One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.
Frisbeeteria wrote:Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs?
Not a good question, because it's never happened and never will. Every one of us is inactive in some forums - i.e. I never participate in RP. A&F, or General threads. Furthermore, "participation" means active participation in the topic under discussion. Simply posting a warning in some thread does not disqualify a mod from ruling on a different post or posts in the same thread.
Luna Amore wrote:Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.
No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?
One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.
Luna Amore wrote:Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.
No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?
One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.
United Republic Empire wrote:Luna Amore wrote:One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.
I thought Violet gets summoned from the furthest depths of the void to perform a quick finger snap with their infinity gauntlet. From dust we came unto dust we shall return.
Cavirfi wrote:Who's behind [violet] btw? Max Barry?