Page 1 of 1

[Q]What's with mods doing the reporting?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 12:58 am
by Cavirfi
I've seen 2 moderation topics, where the reporter is a mod, is the mod asking for approval to do action or something?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:07 am
by Conservative Republic Of Huang
Moderators aren't supposed to act in a moderation capacity in a thread if they have been participants in it, so that's probably it.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:09 am
by Sedgistan
If a mod is already involved in a thread, or otherwise feels it would not be appropriate for them to rule for whatever reason, then they can file a report the same way as any other player.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 1:36 am
by Cavirfi
Sedgistan wrote:If a mod is already involved in a thread, or otherwise feels it would not be appropriate for them to rule for whatever reason, then they can file a report the same way as any other player.

Oh, so I kinda answered my own question in a way: They do the reporting for the sake to see if it's actual rule breaking or if it's just a personal bias?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 5:34 am
by Sedgistan
I'm rewording the same thing again, because the question has already been answered. A mod may file a report like any other player, in circumstances when it would not be appropriate for them to act as a mod.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 10:49 am
by Torisakia
Sedgistan wrote:I'm rewording the same thing again, because the question has already been answered. A mod may file a report like any other player, in circumstances when it would not be appropriate for them to act as a mod.

This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:02 am
by Frisbeeteria
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs?

Not a good question, because it's never happened and never will. Every one of us is inactive in some forums - i.e. I never participate in RP. A&F, or General threads. Furthermore, "participation" means active participation in the topic under discussion. Simply posting a warning in some thread does not disqualify a mod from ruling on a different post or posts in the same thread.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:04 am
by Luna Amore
Torisakia wrote:
Sedgistan wrote:I'm rewording the same thing again, because the question has already been answered. A mod may file a report like any other player, in circumstances when it would not be appropriate for them to act as a mod.

This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 11:54 am
by Nantoraka
Luna Amore wrote:
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image

Right right.
I'll have my "Ave Caesar" merchandise out for the moment one of you overthrows Max Barry.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 2:13 pm
by The Reformed American Republic
Luna Amore wrote:
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image

Funny thing is that I was just thinking about The Office.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 7:02 pm
by Torisakia
Frisbeeteria wrote:
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs?

Not a good question, because it's never happened and never will. Every one of us is inactive in some forums - i.e. I never participate in RP. A&F, or General threads. Furthermore, "participation" means active participation in the topic under discussion. Simply posting a warning in some thread does not disqualify a mod from ruling on a different post or posts in the same thread.

I was implying active participation in a thread. But okay.

Luna Amore wrote:
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image

That makes sense.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 10:46 pm
by United Republic Empire
Luna Amore wrote:
Torisakia wrote:This does actually bring up another good question: what happens if every single moderator and admin are involved in the same discussion in which a rule-breaking post occurs? Who makes the ruling? The mods nor admins can because they were actively involved. Is there some sort of constitutional crisis that happens? These are the kinds of things I think about when I'm at home and the internet is out.

No but seriously, is there any actual protocol for a situation like that (even though it's highly unlikely it would ever occur)?

One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image


I thought Violet gets summoned from the furthest depths of the void to perform a quick finger snap with their infinity gauntlet. From dust we came unto dust we shall return.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 10:48 pm
by Cavirfi
United Republic Empire wrote:
Luna Amore wrote:One of us institutes the Emergency Powers Protocol and declares ourselves supreme leader. Don’t worry, the person will step down when the crisis is over.

Image


I thought Violet gets summoned from the furthest depths of the void to perform a quick finger snap with their infinity gauntlet. From dust we came unto dust we shall return.

Who's behind [violet] btw? Max Barry?

PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2021 6:46 am
by Nepleslia
Cavirfi wrote:Who's behind [violet] btw? Max Barry?

AFAIK Violet is a different person then Max, but - like Max - has been around since NS was founded back in the Stone Age 2003.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 5:17 pm
by Katganistan
We are careful to make sure that we leave enough mods who have not been directly involved in a ruling to rule on the appeal. Clearly, if EVERY mod on the site has been involved in deciding that X is wrong, that's all she wrote.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 9:16 pm
by Shazbotdom
Cavirfi wrote:
United Republic Empire wrote:
I thought Violet gets summoned from the furthest depths of the void to perform a quick finger snap with their infinity gauntlet. From dust we came unto dust we shall return.

Who's behind [violet] btw? Max Barry?

[violet] is a mysterious force that no one knows where she came from. She appeared one day and has been a driving force in the implementation of new features throughout the NS Multiverse. All I know is that she is a Titan, most likely from the old Warcraft lore, and should be revered as a Titan should be.


Be afraid and don't upset the Titan.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:05 pm
by Frisbeeteria
I think we're pretty much done here.