Page 1 of 1
[R] Flaming in Japanese Co-Prosperity Sphere
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:11 amby Glorious Hong Kong
Picairn wrote:Nekostan-e Gharbi wrote:Really? You don’t. So I guess you need to see them. My oldest account is actually in 2016-2017 lol.
I don't care. You defend genocidal empires, unironically support a Jewish supremacist militant group, advocate for WW3 against China, then backtrack when people mirror your proposals.
In my book you're generally a horrible person.
Flaming. Bolding mine.
Picairn wrote:Nekostan-e Gharbi wrote:I’m here to maximize the amount of cattiness on NSG by following existing logic and forcing hoomanz to be consistent. Since hoomanz are hypocritical as hell everyone hates me. Yay!
Everyone hates you because of the reasons I cited.
Baiting.
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:26 amby Picairn
Explain to me how exactly "a horrible person" is flaming, and how exactly stating a fact is baiting?
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:29 amby Alaska Hawaii and the Aleutes
Pitcairn didn't do anything wrong. Speaking your mind that you dislike somebody seems like a general ok thing. I could not find a single rule which speaks against that.
That whole topic is very controversial though, so I'm not surprised, it was bound to happen eventually.
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 7:35 amby Ellbonnia
Looking back in context, Nekostan outright stated they were trolling at multiple points. Criticizing such a person, who was not seriously contributing to the discussion outside of attempting to anger others, is not "flaming" and should not be equated with such.
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 8:29 amby Giovenith
Addressed.Picairn wrote:Explain to me how exactly "a horrible person" is flaming, and how exactly stating a fact is baiting?
Personally attacking someone is flaming. Calling someone "a horrible person" is about as basic and to-the-point flaming as it gets.Alaska Hawaii and the Aleutes wrote:Pitcairn didn't do anything wrong. Speaking your mind that you dislike somebody seems like a general ok thing. I could not find a single rule which speaks against that.
That whole topic is very controversial though, so I'm not surprised, it was bound to happen eventually.
Ellbonnia wrote:Looking back in context, Nekostan outright stated they were trolling at multiple points. Criticizing such a person, who was not seriously contributing to the discussion outside of attempting to anger others, is not "flaming" and should not be equated with such.
Neither of you were involved in this incident and so your opinions on it are neither needed nor wanted. The next time you post in a report thread in which you are neither a reporter nor reported party, you will be WARNED for spamming in Moderation.
Posted:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 9:13 amby Glorious Hong Kong
Thanks for taking a look Gio! *Leaves Lunar New Year firecrackers*