[R] Reposting Locked Thread

[The New California Republic]

Munk, do not repost.

Quite an explicit instruction not to repost a thread on the same subject after the last several tries turned into total trainwrecks of redtext galore, but he has done it anyway without asking first:

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=495052

[Nationalist Northumbria]

Circumstances have changed - we've got press coverage now - and we've avoided any rule-breaking.

Additionally, I would just like to state that this is a broader pattern of using reports as harassment by this user, who seems intent on following me around everywhere, no matter what I do, and reporting my posts under the widest interpretation of breaking the rules. It would be disappointing if moderation encouraged this.

[The New California Republic]

Circumstances have changed - we've got press coverage now - and we've avoided any rule-breaking.

Additionally, I would just like to state that this is a broader pattern of using reports as harassment by this user, who seems intent on following me around everywhere, no matter what I do, and reporting my posts under the widest interpretation of breaking the rules. It would be disappointing if moderation encouraged this.

I saw that you were reposting another iteration of a series of threads that have been trainwrecks of redtext, even though a Mod said no to reposting. I saw something that might be rulebreaking and reported it, so your accusation of harassment is total nonsense.

[Celritannia]

I would like to add, the so called "press coverage" are mostly blog pieces, with 2 main UK news papers, one of them being questionable at best.

[Farnhamia]

Circumstances have changed - we've got press coverage now - and we've avoided any rule-breaking.

Additionally, I would just like to state that this is a broader pattern of using reports as harassment by this user, who seems intent on following me around everywhere, no matter what I do, and reporting my posts under the widest interpretation of breaking the rules. It would be disappointing if moderation encouraged this.

I'll allow it, since it's been almost a year since the last one. If this degenerates into flames and fire, this will be your last one, Munk.

[Farnhamia]

I would like to add, the so called "press coverage" are mostly blog pieces, with 2 main UK news papers, one of them being questionable at best.

Yeah, but so what? People start threads that way all the time. Don't spam Moderation.

[North American Imperial State]

viewtopic.php?p=38004474#p38004474

Even with the 'Tongue in Cheek' Disclaimer seems not kosher.

[The New California Republic]

If this degenerates into flames and fire, this will be your last one, Munk.

Tbh it's starting in earnest already, calling each other "simp" and "noob":

Because I’m not a snitch or a simp for random moderators?
If you want a better forum make your own.

Ok, noob.

[Grenartia]

If this degenerates into flames and fire, this will be your last one, Munk.

Tbh it's starting in earnest already, calling each other "simp" and "noob":

Ok, noob.

Is "noob" even a flame anymore? Like, maybe, 15 years ago, it was, but by this point, its arguably a neutral term. And, the poster in question fits the description, having joined only barely 3 months ago.

[United Republic Empire]

viewtopic.php?p=38004461#p38004461

Seems a tad close/borderline to all x and y - with saying that people that report rulebreaking are snitches and tattletales

Also the fact that NEC is the one that reported the thread and then the poster saying the snitches all of the world all gather here after talking about people that report threads, Seems to go near flamebait territory

[New Visayan Islands]

Toast is ready, who wants breakfast?

[The New California Republic]

Cheers NVI.

[North American Imperial State]

Toast is ready, who wants breakfast?

Thank you NVI