[R] trolling in wingthread thread

by **South Odreria 2** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 12:45 am

Bolded for emphasis

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
The Marlborough wrote:Yes you can. Banter is allowed on most public forums I have been on, even when it gets vulgar and rowdy. Mods are able to discern when people are friends and when they are not and if they need help, other posters are usually willing to inform on the relationship between two posters.

Well "most public forums" are there for you. You have options, I don't. Stop trying to wreck my NSG.

by **South Odreria 2** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 12:51 am

More:

Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:Yeah you're right guys, why don't we just leave? Nobel says it would be easier.

WRA said that banter is prevalent everywhere else on the internet. So if banter is an essential part of your forum experience, you have a very wide range of options. I suggest an adults only board, there you can talk openly about sex as well, I expect you'd enjoy that.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 12:54 am

As the victim party for the second example, I wanted to state that I consider Nobel a friend of mine and that it didn't mean any wrongful intent.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:09 am

On the contrary, this isn't my friend, and isn't certified banter™

Shazbotdom wrote:
Because your dislike of the decision is drenched in a whole ton of "oh, woe is mee, I can't flame my friends and get away with it" patheticness?

by **Shazbotdom** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:10 am

Nouveau Quebecois wrote:On the contrary, this isn't my friend, and isn't certified banter™
Shazbotdom wrote:
Because your dislike of the decision is drenched in a whole ton of "oh, woe is mee, I can't flame my friends and get away with it" patheticness?

And I broke no rules.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:11 am

Shazbotdom wrote:
Nouveau Quebecois wrote:On the contrary, this isn't my friend, and isn't certified banter™

And I broke no rules.

Ok, I think you called me pathetic in that comment and I would like the Moderators to look at it so I posted it here.

by **Shazbotdom** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:12 am

Nouveau Quebecois wrote:
Shazbotdom wrote:And I broke no rules.

Ok, I think you called me pathetic in that comment and I would like the Moderators to look at it so I posted it here.

I said that your attitude of not being able to flame your friends and get away with it was pathetic. If I wanted to flame you, I would have done so, but I didn't. I attacked your argument. There is a difference.

by **Starblaydia** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:13 am

Not seeing anything in these three reports as actionable.

by **Shazbotdom** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:15 am

Starblaydia wrote:Not seeing anything in these three reports as actionable.

Gratzi

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:16 am

Starblaydia wrote:Not seeing anything in these three reports as actionable.

Alright, can I get a second opinion on someone calling my attitude pathetic?

by **Sedgistan** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:34 am

I agree with Starblaydia's ruling.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:37 am

Ok thanks.

by **Shazbotdom** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 1:40 am

Sedgistan wrote:I agree with Starblaydia's ruling.

Gratzi, once again.

by **Greater vakolicci haven** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 2:03 am

Advocating criminal activity?

viewtopic.php?p=37310495#p37310495

by **The Archbishopric of York** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 2:04 am

Honeydewistania wrote:

Anyways, good riddance to these threads. It was a long time coming.

Wayneactia wrote:
Neanderthaland wrote:But it does seem like there should be some sort of more political megathread, so as to not undermine the typically laid-back atmosphere of TET.

It's called REDDIT. This is a political simulation game that involves running nations. Why there is even a general forum for chatting about shit, and major news stories is beyond me. If you check the posting history of a majority of the nations in General, you will notice 99% of their posts are only in General. Most of the nations that are posting in general, with huge post counts could care less about the game. Just my opinion, but I don't think the arrow missed the target by much.

I don't see what utility these kinds of posts have other than pouring gasoline on a fire and making people who are already angry about the RWDT and LWDT being shut down even angrier. Surely this qualifies as trolling?

by **The Archregimancy** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 2:10 am

I do not see the posts reported by GVC or The Archbishopric of York as trolling within the context of that specific discussion.

The whole point of leaving that discussion thread running is to allow a range of views to be represented, both for and against.

by **Greater vakolicci haven** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 2:12 am

NP.

TBF this might be looking a bit threadjacky atm, and yeah I obviously admit that I've contributed pretty heavily towards it.

by **WayNeacTia** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 3:30 am

viewtopic.php?p=37310727#p37310727

I seriously dislike have to file moderation reports, by NQ really needs to dial it back now. The borderline flaming of mods is really becoming excessive now.

Cheers in advance.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 3:32 am

Wayneactia wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=37310727#p37310727

I seriously dislike have to file moderation reports, by NQ really needs to dial it back now. The borderline flaming of mods is really becoming excessive now.

Cheers in advance.

I don't believe that violates any flaming rules set forth in the ToS or The One Stop Rules Shop, especially considering personal attacks are completely void from said post. No moderator participating in thread, nor the moderator who warned me commented anything regarding potential rulebreaking nor line-straddling related to flaming/flamebait either, which makes sudden moderation action all the more foreign to the situation. Hopefully the moderation team agrees.

by **Sedgistan** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 3:41 am

It's not flaming, but it's 100% bad faith. I've split that and two other bad faith posts from the last page off to the evidence locker.

by **Nouveau Quebecois** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 3:43 am

Sedgistan wrote:It's not flaming, but it's 100% bad faith. I've split that and two other bad faith posts from the last page off to the evidence locker.

Ok. I won't post in bad faith in the future.

by **WayNeacTia** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 3:48 am

Appreciate you looking into it Sedge.

by **WayNeacTia** » Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:23 am

viewtopic.php?p=37310995#p37310995

Once again, low blows seem to be the norm.

Edit:

viewtopic.php?p=37311073#p37311073
viewtopic.php?p=37311082#p37311082

Contributes a grand sum of nothing to the thread, other than sniping.

[R] trolling in wingthread thread

[R] trolling in wingthread thread

Who is online