Souseiseki wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:We've now spent several days and dozens of pages rehashing the rights and wrongs of the decision, and why we think it was terrible/not terrible but badly communicated/absolutely fine. I think we can safely assume that, at this point, almost one one's minds are going to be changed.
i understand why you're moving in this direction, but i do think that this does come as a bit of convenient redirection. like "it's done, it's over, placate yourselves by talking about something else" delivered in a nice tone.
I can likewise see why it might come across that way to the sceptical, but I assure you that wasn't my intent.
I can't in any case stop people from unleashing another broadside against the original decision; I can only try and encourage discussion in a more constructive direction.
I only ask that you consider this... what's more likely to lead to constructive dialogue and potential change? The first 50 or so pages of this thread, or the last 3 pages of this thread?