[R] Trolling in LGBT+ SCOTUS decision

[Necroghastia]

The SCOTUS has just ruled in a 6-3 decision that federal law extends to LGBT+ workers and that they are thus protected from discrimination and firing. It is now illegal to be fired at any place of employment in the US for being LGBT+

This is a great victory for the US. And I couldn’t be happier. Honestly this is a pretty great decision and one that proves that just because the court might be more conservative doesn’t mean it’s going to roll back rights

https://www.ajc.com/news/local/supreme- ... SP34gN2yI/

Yeah that's the wrong move.
No discrimination in any sort of government capacity sure.

But in any other capacity, no. Let bigots be bigots and move on, you don't have the right to be viewed positively. And at this point any violence they commit against you is in defence of their way of life and is totally justified.

Bolding mine. Saying violence against LGBT people is justified.

[Audioslavia]

Addressed here

[King of the Incels]

Addressed here

I'm saying violence in self defence is justified. It doesn't matter who it is.

[Andsed]

…Right, so you don’t know how the law works.

Pretty much. Can't expect too much from an evolutionary dead-end though.

Bolding mine pretty sure calling someone an ¨evolutionary dead-end¨ is flaming.

[Audioslavia]

Pretty much. Can't expect too much from an evolutionary dead-end though.

Bolding mine pretty sure calling someone an ¨evolutionary dead-end¨ is flaming.

If the user identifies as an Incel then 'evolutionary dead-end' is less problematic.

[King of the Incels]

Bolding mine pretty sure calling someone an ¨evolutionary dead-end¨ is flaming.

If the user identifies as an Incel then 'evolutionary dead-end' is less problematic.

Oh I thought we treated everyone the same here.

[King of the Incels]

So can I get this taken off my record because its obviously not what I was doing.

[Farnhamia]

So can I get this taken off my record because its obviously not what I was doing.

Doesn't matter who you say is defending themselves, it's still advocating violence. Appeal denied.

[Diarcesia]

Pretty much. Can't expect too much from an evolutionary dead-end though.

Bolding mine pretty sure calling someone an ¨evolutionary dead-end¨ is flaming.

Second opinion on this? I feel this is indeed flaming.

[Farnhamia]

Bolding mine pretty sure calling someone an ¨evolutionary dead-end¨ is flaming.

Second opinion on this? I feel this is indeed flaming.

Me, too, we should get a Mod to ... wait, I am one! viewtopic.php?p=37288281#p37288281

[King of the Incels]

So can I get this taken off my record because its obviously not what I was doing.

Doesn't matter who you say is defending themselves, it's still advocating violence. Appeal denied.

Ah what.
So people can't use defending themselves and their way of life.
Thats new.

[Diarcesia]

Second opinion on this? I feel this is indeed flaming.

Me, too, we should get a Mod to ... wait, I am one! viewtopic.php?p=37288281#p37288281

salamat sa pagsuri
*leaves balut*

[Centai Mal]

Doesn't matter who you say is defending themselves, it's still advocating violence. Appeal denied.

Ah what.
So people can't use defending themselves and their way of life.
Thats new.

Defend yourself with words, not with threats of violence.

[Farnhamia]

Ah what.
So people can't use defending themselves and their way of life.
Thats new.

Defend yourself with words, not with threats of violence.

Don't post in report threads unless you're directly involved or have evidence to offer. Your opinion isn't wanted.