NationStates

New haven america wrote:Tars is on my ignore list so let me guess: Multiple paragraphs about why everything I posted is wrong followed by at least 2-3 ad homs and ending on dubious flamebaiting?

Tarsonis wrote:But you're bitching that they want to explore this idea.

If anything it suggests the writers are too smart for their own good, seeing as a casual viewer such as yourself, demonsteably lack the necessary knowledge to be able to piece it together.

New haven america wrote:There's nothing in the rules that states you can't tell someone whether they're on your ignore list or not.

Besides, every conversation I have with you were I don't totally agree with what you say eventually devolves into you spewing ad homs and flamebaiting,

and I've been gracious enough in the past to just let it slide

and go along with my business because I don't care enough to make a report thread every time we have a debate and accept that that's simply what's going to happen when talking to you so I try to avoid doing such as much as possible.

Also, for the mods: I've already told him in that very thread that if he doesn't like what I have to say then he can put me on ignore but he doesn't seem like he's going to do that anytime soon, so...

Here's a quick example from that very thread of said ad homs and flamebaiting he's known to perform on the regular (That came from the very post I was talking about no less):

Tarsonis wrote:But you're bitching that they want to explore this idea.

If anything it suggests the writers are too smart for their own good, seeing as a casual viewer such as yourself, demonsteably lack the necessary knowledge to be able to piece it together.

Tarsonis wrote:

New haven america wrote:There's nothing in the rules that states you can't tell someone whether they're on your ignore list or not.

Sure there's informing someone you got them ignore, and then theres what you did, which was gloating how I was on ignore and make baseless accusations.

Besides, every conversation I have with you were I don't totally agree with what you say eventually devolves into you spewing ad homs and flamebaiting,

It's one thing to disagree, it's another to unjustifiably piss on something and then try to play the victim whenever its pointed out how baseless your claims are.

and I've been gracious enough in the past to just let it slide

Dont make me laugh.

and go along with my business because I don't care enough to make a report thread every time we have a debate and accept that that's simply what's going to happen when talking to you so I try to avoid doing such as much as possible.

You responded to me. Remember that.

Also, for the mods: I've already told him in that very thread that if he doesn't like what I have to say then he can put me on ignore but he doesn't seem like he's going to do that anytime soon, so...

It's not that I dont like what you have to say, its more I'm not gonna let what you say go without challenge. If you're not apt to the task of defending your points that is your short coming not mine.

Here's a quick example from that very thread of said ad homs and flamebaiting he's known to perform on the regular (That came from the very post I was talking about no less):

While I won't pretend I wasnt being snide, those were merely observations, not attacks. You are bitching, repeatedly, about the direction the show. And You repeatedly demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the lore. Pointing that out is not an insult. There's plenty of things I'm merely a casual viewer of, and in a lore discussion people would be right in pointing that out.


But what really gets me here is that you've actually demonstrated my point here by quoting the text. Not only did you read the post, you then lied, gloating about how I was ignore and you hadn't, in order to attack me.

Proof posivltive of both ignore gloating and bad faith posting.

New haven america wrote:Tars is on my ignore list so let me guess: Multiple paragraphs about why everything I posted is wrong followed by at least 2-3 ad homs and ending on dubious flamebaiting?

Twilight Imperium wrote:

Tarsonis wrote:Sure there's informing someone you got them ignore, and then theres what you did, which was gloating how I was on ignore and make baseless accusations.


It's one thing to disagree, it's another to unjustifiably piss on something and then try to play the victim whenever its pointed out how baseless your claims are.


Dont make me laugh.


You responded to me. Remember that.



It's not that I dont like what you have to say, its more I'm not gonna let what you say go without challenge. If you're not apt to the task of defending your points that is your short coming not mine.




While I won't pretend I wasnt being snide, those were merely observations, not attacks. You are bitching, repeatedly, about the direction the show. And You repeatedly demonstrate a lack of knowledge of the lore. Pointing that out is not an insult. There's plenty of things I'm merely a casual viewer of, and in a lore discussion people would be right in pointing that out.


But what really gets me here is that you've actually demonstrated my point here by quoting the text. Not only did you read the post, you then lied, gloating about how I was ignore and you hadn't, in order to attack me.

Proof posivltive of both ignore gloating and bad faith posting.

.....

New haven america wrote:Tars is on my ignore list so let me guess: Multiple paragraphs about why everything I posted is wrong followed by at least 2-3 ad homs and ending on dubious flamebaiting?

The irony is palpable.