viewtopic.php?f=20&t=481402&p=36779624#p36779624
Flaming? Flamebait? Regardless, seems over the line accusing another poster of not having coherent thoughts
by Neu California » Fri Feb 28, 2020 9:34 pm
by Ostroeuropa » Sat Feb 29, 2020 7:54 am
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:37 am
Gormwood wrote:Seriously, Ostro sounds like he'd be an ideal Sad Puppy. Griping about how most, if not all stories should be centered around white males.
by Gormwood » Sat Feb 29, 2020 12:01 pm
Sad Puppies was an unsuccessful[1] right-wing[2] anti-diversity[3] voting campaign intended to influence the outcome of the annual Hugo Awards, the longest-running prize (since 1953) for science fiction or fantasy works.
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sat Feb 29, 2020 12:33 pm
Gormwood wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Possible flamebait.
Sad PuppiesSad Puppies was an unsuccessful[1] right-wing[2] anti-diversity[3] voting campaign intended to influence the outcome of the annual Hugo Awards, the longest-running prize (since 1953) for science fiction or fantasy works.
by Questarian New Yorkshire » Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:34 pm
Hiding the double entendre behind 'well technically' is quite clever, but incredibly transparent, and if you are not punished for it in some way the transparency of this websites administration will be very, very clear (for the 100,000th time, if nobody was watching)Gormwood wrote:LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Possible flamebait.
Sad PuppiesSad Puppies was an unsuccessful[1] right-wing[2] anti-diversity[3] voting campaign intended to influence the outcome of the annual Hugo Awards, the longest-running prize (since 1953) for science fiction or fantasy works.
Advertisement