NationStates

Byzconia wrote:

Happpy wrote:Guess what? We have a name for people who actively side with fascists, platform them, repeat their talking points, and actively cater to them on every single level of government policy and society............. they're called fascists.

Except the definition of "fascist" is not "helps fascists." You can make a political alliance with someone without sharing their ideology. (Note: that doesn't mean it's okay to help fascists, but doesn't make one a fascist, either.)

That's it? That's your r ENTIRE basis for Trump being a liberal? Guess what? By using your defenition, EVERYONE would be a fucking liberal, even the commies you love, since most commie countries still engaged in MARKET TRADE.

A) Free trade =/= capitalism

B) It's not "my" definition, it's that actual ideological definition of the term. Just because Americans love to fuck up and misuse political terminology doesn't mean it's okay.

C) When did I ever say I "love commies"? I'm a libsoc, I hate authoritarian socialism as much as I hate capitalism. Though, I do think it's pretty hilarious how you appear to be completely incapable of disagreeing with someone without calling them a fascist/commie. If you're not going to engage in good faith, then please fuck off.

-snip-

Proctopeo wrote:More trolling, from the same thread, albeit by a different user.

Farnhamia wrote:

Proctopeo wrote:More trolling, from the same thread, albeit by a different user.

Not trolling.

Proctopeo wrote:Yeah... second opinion necessary.

Audioslavia wrote:Byzconia has been warned since that post. I've left a note on his file pointing to the post you've linked to, so the leash has become shorter.

Cheers.

Neu California wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=36619405#p36619405

Flaming

Sanezplane wrote:

Kowani wrote:Whether they should or should not is a moral question-it’s not really relevant. I would prefer to live in one where they are not, but not because of the moral issue, but rather, that I would prefer not to be in danger of those things.


Yeah, I have no clue what you’re talking about.

I don't have to care about your preferences. I cna still shoot you if you don't even have the spine to stand up for some basic morals to protect yourself.

Sanezplane wrote:

Kowani wrote: That’s not how that works. Action does not confer moral belief.

Yeesh, and I thought the normal psychoanalysis was shitty. You’ve managed to dive headfirst into the toilet.

Action to a moral agent opposed to you is a moral response to an action against us.

Also, it's not psychoanalysis, it's merely what you have conveyed. That you refuse to admit what a loser you are at your own game is not my personal problem either.

Sanezplane wrote:

Genivaria wrote:It's obvious you do care or you wouldn't keep responding, or are you trying to get a rise out of people?

I don't care enough to think I matter. I know this is all a game anyhow and all of you losers will not remember this tomorrow anyways so why bother thinking whether or not I am somebody. I'm just as much of a nobody as you are. My main advantage tho is that tomorrow you and Kowani will be irrelevant, because you are nobodies that don't affect my life in the slightest and you can wallow in your own woke pity.