NERVUN wrote:The issue comes from what happens when we forget to switch out?
We make fun of you for a bit and then move on.
Advertisement
by Aclion » Thu Sep 19, 2019 8:06 pm
NERVUN wrote:The issue comes from what happens when we forget to switch out?
by NERVUN » Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:47 pm
by Aclion » Thu Sep 19, 2019 9:50 pm
by USS Monitor » Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:08 pm
by The Free Joy State » Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:19 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Switching between puppets really can get tiresome if you have to switch a lot. I don't think the whole mod team should have to deal with another tiresome repetitive task when most of them are not getting into such heated arguments.
by USS Monitor » Thu Sep 19, 2019 10:58 pm
The Free Joy State wrote:USS Monitor wrote:Switching between puppets really can get tiresome if you have to switch a lot. I don't think the whole mod team should have to deal with another tiresome repetitive task when most of them are not getting into such heated arguments.
Even if you don't switch a lot, it's easy to forget which account you're logged into if your mind gets focused onto a task (this has been an issue for me on RMB posting).
This seems like it could be an unnecessary complication. Even if people aren't on ignore, it is possible to just scan past the posts of people that you don't want to read. Most people's avatars are pretty recognisable at scrolling pace.
Katganistan wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:What's better, murder or torture?
Neither, and since abortion isn't murder, I aim not to have women tortured.
Did you SERIOUSLY ask that question?
"Would you rather I killed you quickly or spent months cutting pieces off of you?"
That is just sick.United Muscovite Nations wrote:"God, what is WRONG with people trying to make parents take care of their children"
That's what this sounds like to me.
Then you are either not comprehending or being willfully obtuse.
by SherpDaWerp » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:27 pm
by USS Monitor » Thu Sep 19, 2019 11:45 pm
SherpDaWerp wrote:I know this would involve more Admin code (shock! horror!), but might it be a good idea to add some feature wherein mods can make "mod posts"? For one, it would mean everyone can obviously and easily tell the difference between a mod acting as a mod and a mod doing other stuff, and in a scenario like this, the Ignore feature could just explicitly not apply to tagged "mod posts".
by The Blaatschapen » Fri Sep 20, 2019 3:05 am
SherpDaWerp wrote:I know this would involve more Admin code (shock! horror!), but might it be a good idea to add some feature wherein mods can make "mod posts"? For one, it would mean everyone can obviously and easily tell the difference between a mod acting as a mod and a mod doing other stuff, and in a scenario like this, the Ignore feature could just explicitly not apply to tagged "mod posts".
[b]The Blaatschapen - NationStates Moderator[/b]
by Ethel mermania » Fri Sep 20, 2019 3:15 am
by Nilrahrarfan » Fri Sep 20, 2019 5:33 am
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Katganistan repeatedly engages in toxic personal attacks in the Abortion thread in the hopes of driving any pro-life presence from the thread, as well as spamming the thread with sometimes 7 or 8 posts in one batch. Other users who engage in this behavior, we are told to put on ignore, but this is not possible with her. Is there anything I can do with that or do I just have to deal with it?
by The New California Republic » Fri Sep 20, 2019 5:47 am
USS Monitor wrote:The Free Joy State wrote:Even if you don't switch a lot, it's easy to forget which account you're logged into if your mind gets focused onto a task (this has been an issue for me on RMB posting).
This seems like it could be an unnecessary complication. Even if people aren't on ignore, it is possible to just scan past the posts of people that you don't want to read. Most people's avatars are pretty recognisable at scrolling pace.
I don't believe it's reasonable to put that burden entirely on UMN without offering an ignore feature like there is for ordinary players, or asking Kat to cut back on stuff like this:Katganistan wrote:But it would be just to torture a woman by forcing her to have her rapist's child and risk her life and health.
Sounds VERY christian.Katganistan wrote:
Neither, and since abortion isn't murder, I aim not to have women tortured.
Did you SERIOUSLY ask that question?
"Would you rather I killed you quickly or spent months cutting pieces off of you?"
That is just sick.
Then you are either not comprehending or being willfully obtuse.
I'm pro-choice and years of listening to the abortion debate have only made me more adamantly pro-choice, but this is obnoxious. You can tell UMN he is wrong as fuck without calling him "willfully obtuse," implying he's not a real Christian, or twisting what he said to make it sound like he was just talking about torture for shits and giggles.
Basically, mods shouldn't be posting stuff like this from their mod account, even if they do post less provocative personal posts.
by WayNeacTia » Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:22 am
RiderSyl wrote:You'd really think that defenders would communicate with each other about this. I know they're not a hivemind, but at least some level of PR skill would keep Quebecshire and Quebecshire from publically contradicting eac
wait
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:36 am
by United Muscovite Nations » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:52 am
The New California Republic wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
I don't believe it's reasonable to put that burden entirely on UMN without offering an ignore feature like there is for ordinary players, or asking Kat to cut back on stuff like this:
I'm pro-choice and years of listening to the abortion debate have only made me more adamantly pro-choice, but this is obnoxious. You can tell UMN he is wrong as fuck without calling him "willfully obtuse," implying he's not a real Christian, or twisting what he said to make it sound like he was just talking about torture for shits and giggles.
Basically, mods shouldn't be posting stuff like this from their mod account, even if they do post less provocative personal posts.
To be fair though Monitor, some of UMN's posts haven't been particularly friendly either, with an accusation that the posters in the thread were "neurotic", so...
by Luziyca » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:58 am
by The New California Republic » Fri Sep 20, 2019 7:59 am
United Muscovite Nations wrote:And as the mods always remind people, we can ignore posts that make us angry with the ignore feature. You can't do that with Kat's posts.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Also, I said that because the pro-choice crowd on the thread almost systematically makes posts like that with the intent to drive off any pro-life views from the thread.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:03 am
The New California Republic wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:And as the mods always remind people, we can ignore posts that make us angry with the ignore feature. You can't do that with Kat's posts.
Self control. Just don't go in the thread, as you have said on previous occasions. You have already proposed the solution to this problem that you have brought to moderation; why you are ignoring said solution now I cannot quite fathom.United Muscovite Nations wrote:Also, I said that because the pro-choice crowd on the thread almost systematically makes posts like that with the intent to drive off any pro-life views from the thread.
Speculation. Nothing more.
by The New California Republic » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:05 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:And as the mods always remind people, we can ignore posts that make us angry with the ignore feature. You can't do that with Kat's posts.The New California Republic wrote:Self control. Just don't go in the thread, as you have said on previous occasions. You have already proposed the solution to this problem that you have brought to moderation; why you are ignoring said solution now I cannot quite fathom.
Kat goes on more than one thread, you know.
by Juristonia » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:09 am
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
by Ethel mermania » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:44 am
by Lockdownn » Fri Sep 20, 2019 9:43 am
by USS Monitor » Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:12 am
The New California Republic wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
I don't believe it's reasonable to put that burden entirely on UMN without offering an ignore feature like there is for ordinary players, or asking Kat to cut back on stuff like this:
I'm pro-choice and years of listening to the abortion debate have only made me more adamantly pro-choice, but this is obnoxious. You can tell UMN he is wrong as fuck without calling him "willfully obtuse," implying he's not a real Christian, or twisting what he said to make it sound like he was just talking about torture for shits and giggles.
Basically, mods shouldn't be posting stuff like this from their mod account, even if they do post less provocative personal posts.
To be fair though Monitor, some of UMN's posts haven't been particularly friendly either, with an accusation that the posters in the thread were "neurotic", so...
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Also, I said that because the pro-choice crowd on the thread almost systematically makes posts like that with the intent to drive off any pro-life views from the thread.
by Ransium » Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:27 am
by The New California Republic » Fri Sep 20, 2019 10:43 am
USS Monitor wrote:The New California Republic wrote:To be fair though Monitor, some of UMN's posts haven't been particularly friendly either, with an accusation that the posters in the thread were "neurotic", so...
And anyone that doesn't like talking to UMN can put him on ignore because he's not a mod.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement