[R] Trolling

[-Ocelot-]

viewtopic.php?p=36223352#p36223352

It's a paradox because it's based on a false assumption; the assumption that an omnipotent being can exist. So I guess the answer is no because there can't be an omnipotent being in the first place.

Well said fellow intellectual. *Tips fedora*

[Jakker]

I'm not seeing anything here.

[-Ocelot-]

How is this not trolling? The guy is basically calling me a fedora tipper in a derogatory manner, obviously trying to get an angry response from me, while adding nothing to the discussion at hand. It's textbook trolling.

If this is not actionable, should I reply in the same manner as well? Wouldn't that be flaming? I don't get it.

[Jakker]

How is this not trolling? The guy is basically calling me a fedora tipper in a derogatory manner, obviously trying to get an angry response from me, while adding nothing to the discussion at hand. It's textbook trolling.

If this is not actionable, should I reply in the same manner as well? Wouldn't that be flaming? I don't get it.

I'm not seeing it as enough to be flamebaiting, but you are welcomed to ask for a second opinion.

[Kyrusia]

How is this not trolling? The guy is basically calling me a fedora tipper in a derogatory manner, obviously trying to get an angry response from me, while adding nothing to the discussion at hand. It's textbook trolling.

Second opinion: It's textbook snark. It's rude. It's also not actionable.

[-Ocelot-]

How is this not trolling? The guy is basically calling me a fedora tipper in a derogatory manner, obviously trying to get an angry response from me, while adding nothing to the discussion at hand. It's textbook trolling.

Second opinion: It's textbook snark. It's rude. It's also not actionable.

Alright, thanks for taking a look at it.