NATION

PASSWORD

[R] Ableist Slur in Gameplay (UDS)

Who needs it, who got it, who hands it out and why.
User avatar
Cormactopia Prime
Minister
 
Posts: 2764
Founded: Sep 21, 2016
Ex-Nation

[R] Ableist Slur in Gameplay (UDS)

Postby Cormactopia Prime » Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:33 am

viewtopic.php?p=36192892#p36192892

Numero Capitan wrote:P.S. I tend to ignore the looneys who show up on the sidelines, no offense intended

"No offense intended" doesn't negate that he directed an ableist slur against the mentally ill at other users.

EDIT: Per Frisbeeteria's post below, I'm unsure whether to categorize this as flaming, baiting, or trolling, but I believe it's actionable.
Last edited by Cormactopia Prime on Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Frisbeeteria
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 27796
Founded: Dec 16, 2003
Capitalizt

Postby Frisbeeteria » Fri Sep 06, 2019 9:45 am

Flaming is an offense against "named players / nations".
Cormactopia Prime wrote:at other users

That's too generic a pool to be considered flaming, and I'm not seeing any value in enforcing political correctness in terminology used. Not actionable.

User avatar
Cormactopia Prime
Minister
 
Posts: 2764
Founded: Sep 21, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Cormactopia Prime » Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:29 pm

Frisbeeteria wrote:Flaming is an offense against "named players / nations".
Cormactopia Prime wrote:at other users

That's too generic a pool to be considered flaming, and I'm not seeing any value in enforcing political correctness in terminology used. Not actionable.

I'd like to request a second opinion, because if the ableist slur he'd chosen had been "retards" or "autists" instead of "looneys" I think the ruling would be different. And it shouldn't be, because an ableist slur is just as bad when it's referencing the mentally ill as it is when it's referencing the mentally disabled.

If I've misreported it as flaming when it was actually baiting or trolling, so be it, and I've updated the title of the thread to be less specific. But this isn't anymore "enforcing political correctness" than is disallowing any other ableist slur on these forums. There shouldn't be a double standard for mental illness.
Last edited by Cormactopia Prime on Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Luna Amore
Issues Editor
 
Posts: 15751
Founded: Antiquity
Benevolent Dictatorship

Postby Luna Amore » Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:46 pm

Looney just isn't on the same level as retard or autist nor is it used the same. They don't carry the same weight.

I agree with Fris, not actionable.

User avatar
Audioslavia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 3483
Founded: Antiquity
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Audioslavia » Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:49 pm

Ninja'd by Luna, so this is a third opinion rather than a second.

I can't think of a rule that would be broken by off-handedly referring to a group as being 'loony'.

I understand your reasoning. Ableism is something we're sensitive to, but we're not going to throw the net so wide as to include words as comparatively innocuous as 'loony'.


Return to Moderation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile

Advertisement

Remove ads