[R] baiting?

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Your flag tells a very different story.

Not wanting the US to fuck up yet another South American nation isn't the same as unyeilding support for the president of that country. Anyone with more than 3 functioning braincells should probably be able to work that one out. I was very against the Iraq war, but I was not a fan of Saddam by any stretch and Saddam was far worse than Maduro was or could be.

Emphasis mine.

[Old Tyrannia]

Eh, I can see why you've chosen to report it, but it's very borderline. I'm going to err on the side of "not actionable" and deem it just within the acceptable boundaries of NSG snark. You're free to seek a second opinion should you wish.

[Nova Cyberia]

Eh, I can see why you've chosen to report it, but it's very borderline. I'm going to err on the side of "not actionable" and deem it just within the acceptable boundaries of NSG snark. You're free to seek a second opinion should you wish.

What about this?

Well, for a Maduro sympathizer like you I'm sure it wouldn't be.

But for the rest of us, it's fairly obvious that this is a political ploy. Issuing a travel warning for a country that's less dangerous than your own is pretty hilarious.

For someone who uses their signature to squeal passive agressively like a stuck pig about being labeled a fascist and racist you sure do love labeling people. Not a Maduro supporter.

Beside the point anyway. It makes sense for a South American country to issue a warning like this in light of random, unstoppable attacks in public spaces by people who want to kill as many Latinos as possible.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Eh, I can see why you've chosen to report it, but it's very borderline. I'm going to err on the side of "not actionable" and deem it just within the acceptable boundaries of NSG snark. You're free to seek a second opinion should you wish.

Thanks, and respectfully, I do ask for a second opinion.

[Caracasus]

Not too fussed what way this goes, cos obviously I am not impartial here, and therefore not sure if I did cross a line but it'd be well worth looking at context where these two had spent the last 3 pages before this deliberately and aggressively misinterpreting mine and others opinions and statements on this. It's a fairly well co-ordinated wind up/report tag team these two have running really.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Eh, I can see why you've chosen to report it, but it's very borderline. I'm going to err on the side of "not actionable" and deem it just within the acceptable boundaries of NSG snark. You're free to seek a second opinion should you wish.

Thanks, and respectfully, I do ask for a second opinion.

I don't know if my second opinion request was seen. I'm bumping this.

[Starblaydia]

Eh, I can see why you've chosen to report it, but it's very borderline. I'm going to err on the side of "not actionable" and deem it just within the acceptable boundaries of NSG snark. You're free to seek a second opinion should you wish.

Thanks, and respectfully, I do ask for a second opinion.

Agreeding with Tyr's assessment. Still not actionable, especially in the context of a double-team wind-up of Othering labels you've been doing since page 1.