[R] Advocating/Promoting Terrorism/Violence in LWDT

[Proctopeo]

Plus venerating a terrorist, but I'm not sure if that specifically is against the rules.

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=461765&start=10375&p=35941501&view=show#p35941501

Plus other posts in the discussion past this point.

[Torrocca]

I was asking a rhetorical question regarding ND's claim that it's "better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees". Nothing about that is advocating for or promoting violence. In fact, the conversation with ND beyond that point makes it abundantly clear that there was no advocation for violence being made by me.

[Neutraligon]

I am reading it as an hypothetical as as such it is not actionable as it is not actually promoting or advocating terrorism.

[Proctopeo]

I am reading it as an hypothetical as as such it is not actionable as it is not actually promoting or advocating terrorism.

I request a second opinion, please.

[Mallorea and Riva]

I am reading it as an hypothetical as as such it is not actionable as it is not actually promoting or advocating terrorism.

I request a second opinion, please.

I agree with my colleague. Not actionable.

[Scomagia]

You realize what would have come onto Antifa if that guy were more sucessfull and had managed to kill some ICEd fellows?

That they would've stormed other camps in his wake? I doubt they'd put their balls where their rhetoric is, but if they actually do it and free a few people I'd actually applaud them... to the extent that they treated the symptoms, that is.

Torra, slow down. You're missing Proc's point. There are levels here, and while I support violence against state agents if they are found to be harming other people (as in the case you first found yourselves first arguing on), this is not applicable in all cases.

A fucking shame.

If you're gonna do the right thing, fucking plan for every possible contingency, not go full Percy (or is it Perry? I dunno).

From the same thread.

[Neutraligon]

That they would've stormed other camps in his wake? I doubt they'd put their balls where their rhetoric is, but if they actually do it and free a few people I'd actually applaud them... to the extent that they treated the symptoms, that is.

Torra, slow down. You're missing Proc's point. There are levels here, and while I support violence against state agents if they are found to be harming other people (as in the case you first found yourselves first arguing on), this is not applicable in all cases.

A fucking shame.

If you're gonna do the right thing, fucking plan for every possible contingency, not go full Percy (or is it Perry? I dunno).

From the same thread.

Going to say not actionable.