(R) advocating violence in Oregon thread
Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:53 am
Sounds like clear advocation of violence towards elected officials
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
San Carlos Islands wrote:Clearly stated straight up that my tangent was a joke because of the connotations of the guy's flag. I then went on to answer your question about my joke based off what I've seen in other communities.
Never said I advocated for anything...
Torrocca wrote:The militias need to get fucking dealt with too, to the fullest extent of the law possible or otherwise tbqh. What in the actual fuck is this Sturmabteilung bullshit?
Aclion wrote:and another one
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=466794&p=35853220#p35853220Torrocca wrote:The militias need to get fucking dealt with too, to the fullest extent of the law possible or otherwise tbqh. What in the actual fuck is this Sturmabteilung bullshit?
Emphasis mine
Torrocca wrote:San Lumen wrote:
Dealing with them would not be as easy as you think. It could get very bloody. These people are dangerous and heavily armed
If these dumbass militias wanna play stupid fucking games and shoot at people in order to defend literal tyrants who're preventing a representative democracy from carrying out its democratic functions, then they're more than welcome to win the stupid fucking prizes that come along with that.
Torrocca wrote:Except I wasn't, which is clear by my follow-up post to that one where I point out there's a good chance they'd get shot if they try to use violence to prevent the law from arresting and prosecuting them (which isn't an unlikely event considering these are violent far-right militias that are currently openly threatening a state government):Torrocca wrote:
If these dumbass militias wanna play stupid fucking games and shoot at people in order to defend literal tyrants who're preventing a representative democracy from carrying out its democratic functions, then they're more than welcome to win the stupid fucking prizes that come along with that.
Aclion wrote:Torrocca wrote:Except I wasn't, which is clear by my follow-up post to that one where I point out there's a good chance they'd get shot if they try to use violence to prevent the law from arresting and prosecuting them (which isn't an unlikely event considering these are violent far-right militias that are currently openly threatening a state government):
That makes it even more clear what you're advocating, as do your you later posts about them needing to be "dealt with" and "mopped up".
Torrocca wrote:Aclion wrote:That makes it even more clear what you're advocating, as do your you later posts about them needing to be "dealt with" and "mopped up".
Yes, dealt with according to the full extent of the law, if it's possible. Which is literally what the post you quoted says. I don't necessarily consider a situation where an attempt to arrest militia members ends in bloodshed because the militias opened fire to be a part of that umbrella term.
or otherwise tbqh.
Aclion wrote:Torrocca wrote:
Yes, dealt with according to the full extent of the law, if it's possible. Which is literally what the post you quoted says. I don't necessarily consider a situation where an attempt to arrest militia members ends in bloodshed because the militias opened fire to be a part of that umbrella term.or otherwise tbqh.
Torrocca wrote:I don't necessarily consider a situation where an attempt to arrest militia members ends in bloodshed because the militias opened fire to be a part of that ("fullest extent of the law") umbrella term.
Aclion wrote:and another one
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=466794&p=35853220#p35853220Torrocca wrote:The militias need to get fucking dealt with too, to the fullest extent of the law possible or otherwise tbqh. What in the actual fuck is this Sturmabteilung bullshit?
Emphasis mine