NationStates • View topic - R -- Flaming? De-Urbanisation Thread

R -- Flaming? De-Urbanisation Thread

2 posts • Page 1 of 1

Forsher: Postmaster of the Fleet; Posts: 22041; Founded: Jan 30, 2012; New York Times Democracy

Reply with quote

R -- Flaming? De-Urbanisation Thread

by Forsher » Thu Apr 18, 2019 10:59 pm

Dresderstan wrote:
San Lumen wrote:No we dont need more urban sprawl or and more highways to create more pollution

Fucking hypocrite.

If it just said hypocrite I wouldn't report it: just another irrelevant ad hom. But it doesn't. It also appears to be a complete non-sequitur.

That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

Old Tyrannia: Game Moderator; Posts: 16673; Founded: Aug 11, 2009; Father Knows Best State

Reply with quote

by Old Tyrannia » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:31 am

It's borderline; I loomed.

"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.

"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)

⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING ⚜

2 posts • Page 1 of 1

Return to Moderation

Jump to:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

Advertisement