[R] RWDT, nasty implications about a user

[The Blaatschapen]

viewtopic.php?p=35427170#p35427170 but there might be earlier and later quotes and references to it as well.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

In the linked post, I was merely expressing doubt about Hanafuridake's previous statement, where she made the claim that DI was a lolicon (Japanese slang for a pedophile):

Would anybody like to talk about nontraditional Leftism, and their relations to right-wing movements. for example, Sorelianism and any leftist with a view that seems social conservative to the supposedly "Socially Progressive" leftist.

Sorel was a dedicated (if unorthodox) Marxist who collaborated with the Action française out of accelerationism rather than agreement with their monarchist program. The far-right has a weird obsession with appropriating revolutionary chic (National Bolshevism, National Anarchism, National Syndicalism being three examples) which is rather annoying because of how senseless it is. While I would like to assume good faith, it's more likely they're just trying to muddy the waters.

i've got the vapours now don't push such peculiar notions

I would be surprised about a lolicon expressing ecstasy for social conservatism, then I remembered Roy Moore was real.

Continue.

I don't think that DI is a pedo; I believe that somewhere along the line, a very large misunderstanding occurred.

[The Blaatschapen]

Goddammit. I try my hardest to actually not mention nor quote the word, since I want to stay away from it as far as possible.

[Dresderstan]

Wasn't there a similar problem on the previous RWDT and another thread where posters accused others of supporting pedophilia and possibly being pedos as well? I ask because this implication is the same as what happened before. Also I feel the thread was in a mini threadjack about the user being implicated.

[Hanafuridake]

Dumb Ideologies has said that she's a lolicon multiple times over the years. It was included in her signature for a long time, and I've done nothing but to repeat what she's called herself.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

Wasn't there a similar problem on the previous RWDT and another thread where posters accused others of supporting pedophilia and possibly being pedos as well? I ask because this implication is the same as what happened before. Also I feel the thread was in a mini threadjack about the user being implicated.

In my defense, I'm mostly confused as to why Hanafuridake is claiming that DI is... well, that. I suspect a misunderstanding of some sort between the two posters.

[The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord]

Dumb Ideologies has said that she's a lolicon multiple times over the years. It was included in her signature for a long time, and I've done nothing but to repeat what she's called herself.

Please forgive me if I seem impolite, but do you have evidence to back up these accusations?

[Old Tyrannia]

As an active participant in the thread, I'm not able to rule on the report, but I would politely remind all posters that this is a report thread and therefore not the place for discussion.

Dresderstan and The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord: Both of you have made posts not directly contributing new information, and as such I'm giving you both unofficial warnings for spamming moderation.

[Dumb Ideologies]

Err, this was a fairly minor occasional running joke years ago, and quite obviously not serious. I've got no issue with jokes, but people seemingly unironically claiming it as literally true for barrel-scraping character assassinations because they don't like my presumed politics seems to be straying into the territory of no bueno and it would be somewhat troubling if such tactics were not appropriately addressed.

[Neutraligon]

viewtopic.php?p=35427870#p35427870