[R] Spam/gravedig

[Dresderstan]

viewtopic.php?p=35415324#p35415324

viewtopic.php?p=35415336#p35415336

isuspect you are the one who banned incioni after defending me and accussing you of big red text to the divergent cnot political correct opinions know i have proofs of his ban without him havin done flaming at least with his first account, i would had gone toll aswell with a second account if i would had been banned for saying this :

Incion wrote:

Farnhamia wrote:
It's more trolling, really, not flaming. Regardless, this is not how we post here. You are welcome to express your opinion but please do so in a civil manner. Because this is not the first time you've been told this, you are *** banned for one day. ***



For your further education, here is a flow chart to determine how "trolling" is defined by administrative staff.

Is it politically incorrect?

If no -> not trolling. If yes ->

Do I agree with it?

If no -> not trolling. If yes ->

BIG RED TEXT, YOU ARE SILENCED

From a technical perspective, that post was long and disorganized and could have been written better, but clear and concise writing takes practice. In order to defend the practice of free speech on this forum, which is full of people who advocate free speech in their Nationstates but only feel comfortable posting in a "politically correct or revolutionary leftist opinions only" moderation environment, I will attempt to redact the original post into a coherent form so we can discuss the arguments it may contain. One moment.

Farnhamia wrote:
Please don't.
In red text after he banned him
I demand an explanation or i will report Farnhamia for power abuse

I feel farnhamia abused his power i already asking explanationN

[Jakker]

I'm a little confused why you posted this. The links don't go to any posts and the posts that you quoted were from a month ago.

[Dresderstan]

I'm a little confused why you posted this. The links don't go to any posts and the posts that you quoted were from a month ago.

Actually they were created today, I saw them from the same thread, I guess Blueflarst deleted them.

[Jakker]

I'm a little confused why you posted this. The links don't go to any posts and the posts that you quoted were from a month ago.

Actually they were created today, I saw them from the same thread, I guess Blueflarst deleted them.

If so, then yes it looks like they were deleted.

[Drop Your Pants]

If so, then yes it looks like they were deleted.

And someone moved the topic to your locker of many secrets. You just don't realize because you can still see it I'd guess another mod is lurking.

[Jakker]

If so, then yes it looks like they were deleted.

And someone moved the topic to your locker of many secrets. You just don't realize because you can still see it I'd guess another mod is lurking.

If that was the case, I would actually be able to see the linked posts in question and they no longer exist.

[Cotolon]

If that was the case, I would actually be able to see the linked posts in question and they no longer exist.

In that case the topic was deleted, possibly a misclick. The gravedig was on a month old report of a ban turned returning DoS.

Dyp on his phone

[Farnhamia]

https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=35415324#p35415324

viewtopic.php?p=35415336#p35415336

isuspect you are the one who banned incioni after defending me and accussing you of big red text to the divergent cnot political correct opinions know i have proofs of his ban without him havin done flaming at least with his first account, i would had gone toll aswell with a second account if i would had been banned for saying this :

Incion wrote:

Farnhamia wrote:
It's more trolling, really, not flaming. Regardless, this is not how we post here. You are welcome to express your opinion but please do so in a civil manner. Because this is not the first time you've been told this, you are *** banned for one day. ***



For your further education, here is a flow chart to determine how "trolling" is defined by administrative staff.

Is it politically incorrect?

If no -> not trolling. If yes ->

Do I agree with it?

If no -> not trolling. If yes ->

BIG RED TEXT, YOU ARE SILENCED

From a technical perspective, that post was long and disorganized and could have been written better, but clear and concise writing takes practice. In order to defend the practice of free speech on this forum, which is full of people who advocate free speech in their Nationstates but only feel comfortable posting in a "politically correct or revolutionary leftist opinions only" moderation environment, I will attempt to redact the original post into a coherent form so we can discuss the arguments it may contain. One moment.

Farnhamia wrote:
Please don't.
In red text after he banned him
I demand an explanation or i will report Farnhamia for power abuse

I feel farnhamia abused his power i already asking explanationN

Looks like the long one is a Regional Message Board Post, which is why it's not in the forums. At any rate, yes, it's not against the rules to disagree with or be upset about Mod rulings, so long as you do it civilly.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=35415324#p35415324

viewtopic.php?p=35415336#p35415336

Looks like the long one is a Regional Message Board Post, which is why it's not in the forums. At any rate, yes, it's not against the rules to disagree with or be upset about Mod rulings, so long as you do it civilly.

I hope this doesn't constitute spam. I'm sorry if it does. Blueflarst did post that message on the forums in this thread as well as the RMB, but he deleted it on the forum not too long after it was posted. I seen it, but I felt no need to report because it was already in moderation.