[R] Potential Threat

[Nilrahrarfan]

I actually want these three to be legal too, because it can usually be solved by fighting back anyways.

If you find it righteous to kill, to be stolen from and to light things on fire, and then do these things (not necessarily in this order):

-Give all your possessions away.
-Light house on fire.
-Slice your own throat open.

Now, this might seem like the world's most flammable strawman (pun intended) but there is actually a principle involved in law which says that in order for something to be righteous, one of two things must be fulfilled (well, people actually disagree, but most people agree with either):
-You must want it to be done upon yourself too.
-If everyone else does it, it would create a better society.

Smells like trolling

[The World Capitalist Confederation]

If you find it righteous to kill, to be stolen from and to light things on fire, and then do these things (not necessarily in this order):

-Give all your possessions away.
-Light house on fire.
-Slice your own throat open.

Now, this might seem like the world's most flammable strawman (pun intended) but there is actually a principle involved in law which says that in order for something to be righteous, one of two things must be fulfilled (well, people actually disagree, but most people agree with either):
-You must want it to be done upon yourself too.
-If everyone else does it, it would create a better society.

Smells like trolling

Yeah no. I was illustrating the rule of morality in which that, if you believe something is correct, you should be fine with it being done to you.

[USS Monitor]

That's not a threat when taken in context, just trying to illustrate a point in his argument.