Page 1 of 1

[R] possible paedophilia thread

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:46 am
by The Free Joy State
This thread seems likely to go towards a discussion of paedophilia very quickly:

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=457402

In fact it has already been mentioned in the OP [quote edited out]

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:31 am
by The New California Republic
Some possible flaming/ad hominem posts are starting to crop up in it too: viewtopic.php?p=35142387#p35142387

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:35 am
by Trollzyn the Infinite
The New California Republic wrote:Some possible flaming/ad hominem posts are starting to crop up in it too: viewtopic.php?p=35142387#p35142387


How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.

I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:42 am
by The Free Joy State
Attempting to link LGBT organisations and/or people with paedophilia in these posts, which seems to veer close to "all x is y" and/or trolling:
Mardla wrote:
The South Falls wrote:Well, at least you're consistent. I do not believe pederasty is what LGBT people want. This is an isolated group of people.

I don't believe this is what most queers today want. Although I do believe it is backed by queer organanizations and lobbies, but I can distinguish, just as I can between "the Jews" and organizations like the ADL and AJC


Nevv Vegas wrote:
It's a child dancing at a gay bar. Gay bars are NOT some avarage bar. They are enclaves of gayness, a bar that exists because of a sexuality. Drag is disgusting anyway, but seeing a child do it? We are reaching levels of degeneracy that should not be even possible. The Pedophile twitter invasion is also a sign of things to come. Pedophilia is going to be normalized and the children of tomorrow will be taught about the pedo trend of today as some miracoulus struggle that was brave and ahead of its time.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:53 am
by The New California Republic
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:Some possible flaming/ad hominem posts are starting to crop up in it too: viewtopic.php?p=35142387#p35142387


How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.

I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.

Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I didn't realise that performing on stage was inherently sexual. Better shut down high school theatre clubs. Is it just stage, or are all child performances sexual? Does Stranger Things need to be cancelled for having children performing on camera? Should marching bands be strictly over 18s.


Come on, the OP starts with an image from /pol/ suggesting that a spiral on Desmond's face on a billboard is actually the logo of some paedophile organisation. Spirals, evidently, are the secret symbol of child molesters. This is Pizzagate level shit. The kid's just a dancer.


Dude. He's a fucking 10 year old wearing a crop-top and lipstick dancing for grown-ass men in a bar for money. How much more fucking sexual does it need to be before you can object? You actually sicken me. I don't care about OP's 4chan conspiracy theories, I care about what is obviously a child being manipulated by his parents. How the fuck do you know a child is gay at 2 years old? This is no different from child beauty pageants, which are just as disgusting and should be outlawed.

You sicken me and I can't watch you try to defend this disgusting shit just because you're butthurt that OP has an agenda. I don't give a fuck about OP's agenda, this is fucking child abuse.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:04 am
by Trollzyn the Infinite
The New California Republic wrote:
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.

I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.

Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
Dude. He's a fucking 10 year old wearing a crop-top and lipstick dancing for grown-ass men in a bar for money. How much more fucking sexual does it need to be before you can object? You actually sicken me. I don't care about OP's 4chan conspiracy theories, I care about what is obviously a child being manipulated by his parents. How the fuck do you know a child is gay at 2 years old? This is no different from child beauty pageants, which are just as disgusting and should be outlawed.

You sicken me and I can't watch you try to defend this disgusting shit just because you're butthurt that OP has an agenda. I don't give a fuck about OP's agenda, this is fucking child abuse.


I'm pretty sure that doesn't constitute flaming. Now if I called him a sick fuck, that would definitely constitute flaming. Again: I was referring to his belief that the topic was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with. I'll admit I got a little angry at his attempts to defend such a disgusting thing, but I don't think I crossed the line at any point.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:04 am
by Prusselanden
Wow that was quick

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:10 am
by The Free Joy State
Drive by spam: viewtopic.php?p=35142720#p35142720

And a bit of casual "all x-is-y" (emphasis mine)
ShakaZuli wrote:This is why the islamisation of the West is actually a good thing. Whites became degenerate and weak, Muslims and other minorities are just reclaiming their place.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:15 am
by The New California Republic
I'm sure that this kind of thing has also been ruled on in the past:
The Naravid Dynasty wrote:Nibba muhammed literally married a 6 year old


The Muhammad comment has started to spread into a general discussion in the thread.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:20 am
by LiberNovusAmericae
Ifreann wrote:
Mardla wrote:It's going to be used as a pretense for it, yeah. The attention will shifted off the adult and on to children for being "so brave" to be themselves even if intolerant bigots haye it.

It really is such a shame what they've done to your poor brain.

I don't agree with Mardla, but this seems to be taking a jab at his mental state. Forgive me if I'm wrong.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:21 am
by Mardla
The Free Joy State wrote:Attempting to link LGBT organisations and/or people with paedophilia in these posts, which seems to veer close to "all x is y" and/or trolling:
Mardla wrote:I don't believe this is what most queers today want. Although I do believe it is backed by queer organanizations and lobbies, but I can distinguish, just as I can between "the Jews" and organizations like the ADL and AJC


Nevv Vegas wrote:
It's a child dancing at a gay bar. Gay bars are NOT some avarage bar. They are enclaves of gayness, a bar that exists because of a sexuality. Drag is disgusting anyway, but seeing a child do it? We are reaching levels of degeneracy that should not be even possible. The Pedophile twitter invasion is also a sign of things to come. Pedophilia is going to be normalized and the children of tomorrow will be taught about the pedo trend of today as some miracoulus struggle that was brave and ahead of its time.



The Journal of Homosexuality HAS explicitly supported pediphilia, I linked to this in the thread.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10 ... ccess=true

That's not flaming, it is a fact. I went out of my way to say they don't represent all homosexuals anymore than the ADL represents all Jews.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:22 am
by The Free Joy State
The Aisha conversation's still continuing, and I'm certain this kind of justification post has been ruled on: viewtopic.php?p=35142712#p35142712

EDIT: And another spammy post: viewtopic.php?p=35142720#p35142720

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:00 pm
by Neutraligon
Realistic Union wrote:
The Naravid Dynasty wrote:Because they're sexualizing an goddamn kid.

Those degenerats can't understand this.

And flaming.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:08 pm
by The New California Republic
Ad hominems too:
The Naravid Dynasty wrote:This is an homosexual bar, you goddamn meme.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:10 pm
by Agarntrop
Alvecia wrote:
Agarntrop wrote:No, as they're not for any specific sexual orientation.

You don’t have to be gay to go to a gay bar you know. They don’t ask you to suck a dick on entry. Nor does it mean that anything sexual will necessarily happen.

PG-13 violations

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 12:17 pm
by Agarntrop
The South Falls wrote:
Agarntrop wrote:A male kid with little clothing there though...

That's one bar filled with fucked up people.
The Naravid Dynasty wrote:

It's literally in the name.

Homosexual Bar.

Heterosexual bar means guys and girls will be fucking on the floors.

And another one

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:03 pm
by Jakker
Reviewing all of this now

PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:16 pm
by Jakker
Edit: Addressed viewtopic.php?p=35145141#p35145141

There was no need for several of you to post replies in this thread. Unless you are reporting something, your posts are just fairly spammy. Especially yours, Prusselanden