How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.
I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:42 am
by The Free Joy State
Attempting to link LGBT organisations and/or people with paedophilia in these posts, which seems to veer close to "all x is y" and/or trolling:
The South Falls wrote:Well, at least you're consistent. I do not believe pederasty is what LGBT people want. This is an isolated group of people.
I don't believe this is what most queers today want. Although I do believe it is backed by queer organanizations and lobbies, but I can distinguish, just as I can between "the Jews" and organizations like the ADL and AJC
Nevv Vegas wrote: It's a child dancing at a gay bar. Gay bars are NOT some avarage bar. They are enclaves of gayness, a bar that exists because of a sexuality. Drag is disgusting anyway, but seeing a child do it? We are reaching levels of degeneracy that should not be even possible. The Pedophile twitter invasion is also a sign of things to come. Pedophilia is going to be normalized and the children of tomorrow will be taught about the pedo trend of today as some miracoulus struggle that was brave and ahead of its time.
How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.
I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.
Ifreann wrote:I didn't realise that performing on stage was inherently sexual. Better shut down high school theatre clubs. Is it just stage, or are all child performances sexual? Does Stranger Things need to be cancelled for having children performing on camera? Should marching bands be strictly over 18s.
Come on, the OP starts with an image from /pol/ suggesting that a spiral on Desmond's face on a billboard is actually the logo of some paedophile organisation. Spirals, evidently, are the secret symbol of child molesters. This is Pizzagate level shit. The kid's just a dancer.
Dude. He's a fucking 10 year old wearing a crop-top and lipstick dancing for grown-ass men in a bar for money. How much more fucking sexual does it need to be before you can object? You actually sicken me. I don't care about OP's 4chan conspiracy theories, I care about what is obviously a child being manipulated by his parents. How the fuck do you know a child is gay at 2 years old? This is no different from child beauty pageants, which are just as disgusting and should be outlawed.
You sicken me and I can't watch you try to defend this disgusting shit just because you're butthurt that OP has an agenda. I don't give a fuck about OP's agenda, this is fucking child abuse.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote: How is that ad hominem? Because I said he sickens me? That was in regards to his belief that the point of discussion was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with.
I've since added him to foes list anyway, so I won't be replying to any further of his comments.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote: Dude. He's a fucking 10 year old wearing a crop-top and lipstick dancing for grown-ass men in a bar for money. How much more fucking sexual does it need to be before you can object? You actually sicken me. I don't care about OP's 4chan conspiracy theories, I care about what is obviously a child being manipulated by his parents. How the fuck do you know a child is gay at 2 years old? This is no different from child beauty pageants, which are just as disgusting and should be outlawed.
You sicken me and I can't watch you try to defend this disgusting shit just because you're butthurt that OP has an agenda. I don't give a fuck about OP's agenda, this is fucking child abuse.
I'm pretty sure that doesn't constitute flaming. Now if I called him a sick fuck, that would definitely constitute flaming. Again: I was referring to his belief that the topic was perfectly acceptable, which I vehemently disagreed with. I'll admit I got a little angry at his attempts to defend such a disgusting thing, but I don't think I crossed the line at any point.
ShakaZuli wrote:This is why the islamisation of the West is actually a good thing. Whites became degenerate and weak, Muslims and other minorities are just reclaiming their place.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:15 am
by The New California Republic
I'm sure that this kind of thing has also been ruled on in the past:
The Naravid Dynasty wrote:Nibba muhammed literally married a 6 year old
The Muhammad comment has started to spread into a general discussion in the thread.
Mardla wrote:It's going to be used as a pretense for it, yeah. The attention will shifted off the adult and on to children for being "so brave" to be themselves even if intolerant bigots haye it.
It really is such a shame what they've done to your poor brain.
I don't agree with Mardla, but this seems to be taking a jab at his mental state. Forgive me if I'm wrong.
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 11:21 am
by Mardla
The Free Joy State wrote:Attempting to link LGBT organisations and/or people with paedophilia in these posts, which seems to veer close to "all x is y" and/or trolling:
Mardla wrote:I don't believe this is what most queers today want. Although I do believe it is backed by queer organanizations and lobbies, but I can distinguish, just as I can between "the Jews" and organizations like the ADL and AJC
Nevv Vegas wrote: It's a child dancing at a gay bar. Gay bars are NOT some avarage bar. They are enclaves of gayness, a bar that exists because of a sexuality. Drag is disgusting anyway, but seeing a child do it? We are reaching levels of degeneracy that should not be even possible. The Pedophile twitter invasion is also a sign of things to come. Pedophilia is going to be normalized and the children of tomorrow will be taught about the pedo trend of today as some miracoulus struggle that was brave and ahead of its time.
The Journal of Homosexuality HAS explicitly supported pediphilia, I linked to this in the thread.
Agarntrop wrote:No, as they're not for any specific sexual orientation.
You don’t have to be gay to go to a gay bar you know. They don’t ask you to suck a dick on entry. Nor does it mean that anything sexual will necessarily happen.
There was no need for several of you to post replies in this thread. Unless you are reporting something, your posts are just fairly spammy. Especially yours, Prusselanden