I just made the following post in the Ireland abortion thread
Godular wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:Due to the invalidation of empiricism, the quoted post has been mysteriously replaced by the following:
If empiricism is invalidated, we have no cause to trust any perceptions, there is no basis to judge reality, and for all intents and purposes any post from you might as well be some variant of the one above. I don't particularly give a flying fuck how many philosophers you happen to pull out of your ass to support your point, because that plays into MINE.
You must either accept that empiricism and the scientific method function because we must observe things in order to draw any form of conclusion whatsoever, or there is no point in arguing because very apparently nothing has meaning as we cannot trust our perceptions. You do not get to cherry pick when perceptions can be trusted and when they cannot.
In this post I have edited out UMN's words (and stated directly that I have altered the post) in order to present an example of taking his intended point into proper perspective. Would this still count as malicious quote editing?