I initially made a post about the blasphemy ruling in Europe and the issue of what the defedant had done, which involves the historical issue of one of Muhammad's wife.
I reviewed the rules here and understand that pedophilia is off limits here, and I certainly do not disagee with denying a platform to pedophilia apologists.
I did not think however that it might be forbidden to discuss Muhammad and his wife specifically from a historical POV. However, I do not want to get banned for unknowingly violating rules, so I edited my post and removed the summary of the debate about Muhmad which I had previously typed. My original post was quoted once before editing. I do not want to be responsible for a thread derail or any other problems.
I come here in good faith to ask if there is any possibility of discussing the issue. If not, I will not persist in doing so. But please recognize that if mention of this historical fact is forbidden, I did not knowingly intend to violate rules, nor do I wish to subvert the moratorium on the issue of pedophilia, which I understand the reasons for.
