(R) Flame in Libertarian thread

[Idzequitch]

>Pretending Atlanta and the entire area Sherman marched through wasn't part of the Confederacy and helping to uphold slavery

wew laddie what a hot take :^)



More pre-school insults I see. :^)))

Facts don't care if you are insulted. You are cheering about state violence against civilians.

Fuck off, tankie.

[Idzequitch]

Also while I'm here, I would like to submit Torrocca's excessive use of the "dorito face" for review. It is used in almost every post the user has made in this thread, sometimes multiple times in one post. It's rather irritating (which I realize is not itself an offense), and I see it as both slightly trollish and spammy. But I don't know if it explicitly falls outside the bounds of appropriate forum conduct.

Examples from the current page:
viewtopic.php?p=34202044#p34202044
viewtopic.php?p=34205096#p34205096
And this post contains 12 separate uses: viewtopic.php?p=34203097#p34203097

There's a lot more that would be quite easy to find if necessary. Basically I'm just wondering if this is considered acceptable behavior here.

[USS Monitor]

I'm looking over this now and am not thrilled with either player's conduct.

[Torrocca]

Would like to submit another example of what could be considered flaming, as this addresses me:

>implying private property could've happened without violence

NAP-violating libertarian btfo

That's so cute. Go draw anarchy symbols on your notebook while the adults discuss the idiocy of Proudhon.

And Google Proudhon when you have time.

Probably not actionable, but worth a look-at.

Also, AFAIK, the dorito face hasn't been an issue in the past, but I admit that there was definitely excessive usage and that I should've stopped way before that went too far ahead of itself there. If that excessiveness is an issue, I'm glad to stop.

[USS Monitor]

Rulings posted.

The dorito face isn't something we're going to warn for every time we see one, but using it excessively does get baity.

[Idzequitch]

Rulings posted.

The dorito face isn't something we're going to warn for every time we see one, but using it excessively does get baity.

That seems extremely sensible. Many thanks for the clarification and for your time.

[Torrocca]

Rulings posted.

The dorito face isn't something we're going to warn for every time we see one, but using it excessively does get baity.

Understandable; I'll work on watching myself next time a situation like that comes up. I think it'd've been fine overall if there hadn't been an overtly aggressive attitude from the get-go coupled with the whole staunch accusations of me not being who I say I am, but what's done is done.