Saiwania wrote:I'm on the fence as to whether this violated any rule. The legal defense loophole that I see, is that this was their opinion of what would happen, rather than an actual policy proposal made on their behalf; so it was all taken out of context. My interpretations don't hold any power or one iota of influence, but I ask that it be taken under advisement that this is possibly just a misunderstanding?
I accept my warning if reporting things in Moderation counts as spamming moderation, but I notice that other things were ruled on without comment on this, so... Neither involved nor contributing relevant info (as which, I'm given to understand, opinions do not count) on a report (unless they were involved, in which case they are evading a 10-day player ban).