[R] Pic Spamming

[Kannadrickium]

Double posting the same gif twice .

(Image)

(Image)

[Katganistan]

It's a thread full of picspam. What exactly are they doing that's unlike everything else in the thread?

[Kannadrickium]

So if he and I were to post the same gif 100 or more times in succession in that thread, is that ok?

Would genuinely like to know.

No one else can report it as picspam?

After all, according to you, it is a thread for picspam, is it not?

[Euroslavia]

So if he and I were to post the same gif 100 or more times in succession in that thread, is that ok?

Would genuinely like to know.

No one else can report it as picspam?

After all, according to you, it is a thread for picspam, is it not?

The location of the thread is the important factor here. It's in Forum 7, so the rules here are much more lenient in terms of what is declared 'spam'. If the thread were located anywhere else in the forum, action would be taken depending on the circumstance. Case by case basis, and all. In this case, it's fine.

Edit: Further clarification: Double-posting, most of the time, is a result of hitting the submit button multiple times either due to the page loading slow or simply pressing the mouse button multiple times on accident. We probably wouldn't punish players for that if the time stamp was the same time or within a minute or two of the original post.

[Kannadrickium]

(Image)

So this isn't right?

Like you guys said, it's a thread for picspam right?

[Aglrinia]

I’m sorry, but Kannadrickium and Nationstates now under Walt Disney have been going at it for three and a half pages. Making the thread nothing but a constant repeat of:

(Image)

A couple times I understand, but three and a half pages is ridiculous and ruins the thread for other users.

[Kannadrickium]

But the mods above have said it's allowed, no?

[Kyrusia]

But the mods above have said it's allowed, no?

There are obvious limits, and neither of my colleagues' posts were invitations to outright spam. Knock it off with the same thing, over and over again. You already have a history of this sort of behavior (spamming).

[Kannadrickium]

So Northern Ateria gets to spam while I don't?

How come only I get the warning and Northern Ateria doesn't? He's just as guilty of it.

[Kyrusia]

So Northern Ateria gets to spam while I don't?

How come only I get the warning and Northern Ateria doesn't? He's just as guilty of it.

None of Northern Ateria's posts were reported, from what I see; both you and NationStates now under Walt Disney were told to knock it off. Neither of you got anything official.

I haven't trawled the entire thread; if you want to report something, report it. Provide links.

Edit: Unless, based on their sig, you mean the other aforementioned party. I linked the thread post. As you can see, both involved parties were told to knock it off:

Yes. It is, indeed, time to stop.

Contrary to popular belief, F7 isn't the spam board without caveat. There is greater leniency in terms of how "spam" is defined here, but repeatedly posting the same content, over and over again, is spam. End of.

NationStates now under Walt Disney and Kannadrickium: knock it off. There was a point this should have naturally stopped at, yet y'all continued.

[Kannadrickium]

Walt Disney is a puppet of Northern Ateria.

[Kannadrickium]

Notice on the top it says Northern Ateria factbook.

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=nor ... /id=921782

[Kyrusia]

Walt Disney is a puppet of Northern Ateria.

Edit: Unless, based on their sig, you mean the other aforementioned party. I linked the thread post. As you can see, both involved parties were told to knock it off:

Yes. It is, indeed, time to stop.

Contrary to popular belief, F7 isn't the spam board without caveat. There is greater leniency in terms of how "spam" is defined here, but repeatedly posting the same content, over and over again, is spam. End of.

NationStates now under Walt Disney and Kannadrickium: knock it off. There was a point this should have naturally stopped at, yet y'all continued.

There are obvious limits, and neither of my colleagues' posts were invitations to outright spam. Knock it off with the same thing, over and over again. You already have a history of this sort of behavior (spamming).

Emphasis added. Both of you have already been addressed, were addressed before you posted about a party not being addressed. Was linked in the notice posted in this thread, just you're the only of the involved two parties posting here. I suggest you click the emphasized link.