Page 1 of 1

REPORT: Flaming in 'Ridiciously Light Court Rulings'

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:19 am
by Imperial Esplanade
Donut section wrote:People who get off light for their crimes?

Their called women.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:47 am
by Audioslavia
I'm letting Donut Section off light, so by they're arguments I also assume their a woman.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:19 am
by Frenline Delpha
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=410042&p=31612077#p31612077

In the vain of broad, sweeping generalizations.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:25 am
by Luna Amore
Frenline Delpha wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=410042&p=31612077#p31612077

In the vain of broad, sweeping generalizations.

Nothing actionable there.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:33 am
by Imperial Esplanade
Audioslavia wrote:I'm letting Donut Section off light, so by they're arguments I also assume their a woman.


That is certainly sufficient, thank you.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:36 am
by Bressen
Luna Amore wrote:
Frenline Delpha wrote:https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=410042&p=31612077#p31612077

In the vain of broad, sweeping generalizations.

Nothing actionable there.

How is Donut Section's posts actionable but Calladan's isn't? They're both broad, sweeping generalisations without any substantiation. Calladan actually goes further with their generalisation by lumping in anyone who's rich, anyone who's white, and anyone who's male, which is far more than the criteria Donut Section used which was female.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:39 am
by Frisbeeteria
Bressen wrote:How is Donut Section's posts actionable but Calladan's isn't?

Neither was actionable. Read Audio's 'warning'. It applies equally to everyone in the thread.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:46 am
by Bressen
Frisbeeteria wrote:
Bressen wrote:How is Donut Section's posts actionable but Calladan's isn't?

Neither was actionable. Read Audio's 'warning'. It applies equally to everyone in the thread.

Then why was the warning specifically targeted at Donut Section, if it applies equally to everyone in the thread?

PostPosted: Wed Apr 26, 2017 12:09 pm
by Frisbeeteria
What part of "it wasn't a warning" is hard for you to understand? Everyone in the thread can read Audioslavia's post. Presumably it doesn't have to be specifically addressed to every potential generalizer for them to recognize the message.

Furthermore, you don't even have a dog in this fight. If you're not the reporter, the accused, or someone providing additional information relevant to this report, you have no business posting in this thread. Knock it off. NOW.