So, swastikas are forbidded in every way on flags or just if the nation is "totalitarian"? There are also many variations of swastika, are they all forbidden?
http://proswastika.org/e107_images/cust ... _new_2.jpg
by Sudenmaa » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:11 am
by Calladan » Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:39 am
Sudenmaa wrote:So, swastikas are forbidded in every way on flags or just if the nation is "totalitarian"? There are also many variations of swastika, are they all forbidden?
http://proswastika.org/e107_images/cust ... _new_2.jpg
by Sudenmaa » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:31 am
Calladan wrote:Sudenmaa wrote:So, swastikas are forbidded in every way on flags or just if the nation is "totalitarian"? There are also many variations of swastika, are they all forbidden?
http://proswastika.org/e107_images/cust ... _new_2.jpg
99% sure you are in the wrong forum.
by Mallorea and Riva » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:23 am
by -Kekistan- » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:25 am
by -Kekistan- » Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:48 am
by Luna Amore » Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:07 am
by Bralia » Fri Apr 07, 2017 11:02 am
by Frisbeeteria » Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:10 pm
Bralia wrote:I'm extremely hesitant to post at all in this forum unless I'm actually reporting someone.
Bralia wrote:why bother allowing the conversation to occur?
by Bralia » Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:51 pm
Frisbeeteria wrote:Bralia wrote:why bother allowing the conversation to occur?
Because we have dozens or hundreds of new players daily who haven't had to put up with the constant wanna-be Nazis and memelords. We also have daily reports of spam despite telling people to not spam for the past 14 years, yet somehow the message never seems to get through.
by Farnhamia » Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:40 pm
Bralia wrote:Frisbeeteria wrote:As you should be.
I'm glad my total hands off policy is validated. I see people (try to) be helpful around here. Most of the time they seem to be tolerated, but a few times I note that they're not which makes things entirely confusing. Anyway, this is tangential. Back to to the topic:Frisbeeteria wrote:Because we have dozens or hundreds of new players daily who haven't had to put up with the constant wanna-be Nazis and memelords. We also have daily reports of spam despite telling people to not spam for the past 14 years, yet somehow the message never seems to get through.
And I of course understand the nature of the people who make issues out of things, rule-breaking or not, but I'm wondering about the rule in place itself. Maybe it would help deter the more reasonable people out there to put in a line mentioning that "This is not up for discussion" sort of thing? Inject a little oomph to the rule? Like I said already, it's just that these threads never lead to anywhere, so why not cut them short at the minimum or cut them off entirely at maximum. More decisive language and action against fruitless arguments and the like, is pretty much what I'm getting at. It seems it would make Moderation easier to deal with, from my perspective. I would actually totally accept and even appreciate it if I was told that my conversation won't have have merit. I know full well that I'm guilty of pursuing a line of conversation that'll probably end up with the same results of your average Discussion thread.
by Frisbeeteria » Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:42 pm
Bralia wrote: "This is not up for discussion"
by Bralia » Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:55 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Bralia wrote: "This is not up for discussion"
I can't think of anything more certain to garner additional pointless discussion than the above quote. Between the "you're not the boss of me" players and the "I'm 'Murican so I have Free Speech! You can't stop me!" crowd, we'd spend far more time handing out warnings and driving off newbies. It's easier to let them rant for a bit and point them towards old threads.
Once again, this proves the adage that "those who need advice are the least likely to take that advice". By the way, I've had this conversation before too.
Edit: Ninja'd by a padlock, but I'm still posting this response.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chenzorian Viatrok
Advertisement