[R] Use of FLAME in military vs AN

by **Hansdeltania** » Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:44 pm

viewtopic.php?f=25&t=378676&p=31089917#p31089917

by **Kyrusia** » Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:53 pm

by **Hansdeltania** » Fri Feb 17, 2017 11:47 am

More?

Uinted Communist of Africa wrote:
The Union of Continental States wrote:that was when we were only a major power. We are the military equivalent of 3 United States'

Oooooooooo.....so you took over Mexico( a country that isn't up to par with military standards) and then you maliciously attacked Canada.........Congrates

/skip

by **Kyrusia** » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:50 pm

Snarky, but not actionable.

by **Hansdeltania** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:15 pm

Hammer Britannia wrote:
Hydraic Empire wrote:Yes, but it would be a fight worth fighting

OK, you know a nation is Godmodding trash when they say that they can beat REICH OF THE F**KING NEW WORLD ORDER.

/skip

More?

by **Kyrusia** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:31 pm

Looking into this. One moment, please.

by **Kyrusia** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:34 pm

Addressed.

by **Internet Freedom Republic** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:37 pm

No mention of an air force, or sea or space navy so I think with enough bombing, ICBMs, and orbital bombardment it would be difficult, but possible.

by **Farnhamia** » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:39 pm

Internet Freedom Republic wrote:No mention of an air force, or sea or space navy so I think with enough bombing, ICBMs, and orbital bombardment it would be difficult, but possible.

Which has what to do with anything? Do not post in report threads unless you are directly involved or have evidence to offer. Your opinion is neither helpful nor wanted.

[R] Use of FLAME in military vs AN

[R] Use of FLAME in military vs AN

Who is online