[APPEAL] Topic designated as blog spam

[Jamilkhuze]

https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=400783

I didn't mean for this post to sound bloggy. I know the personal anecdote was a bit unnecessary but I thought people would have opinions they'd like to share on the topic. My intention was to stimulate discussion on issues and perceptions of rural voters of public policy and not to indoctrinate people with my personal views. Should I repost this while emphasizing the 2016 US election cycle so it's more relevant to NS General Discussion?

[Frisbeeteria]

but I thought people would have opinions they'd like to share on the topic.

You never mentioned anything about that. That's the difference between a discussion topic and a blog post.

My intention was to stimulate discussion on issues and perceptions of rural voters of public policy and not to indoctrinate people with my personal views.

Then spend some time assembling your post before you hit Submit, and see if it would actually encourage discussion. Your last post didn't.


Also, there's no need for an [APPEAL] tag. You don't get warned for routine thread locks.