Shofercia wrote:Harkonna wrote:You can go ahead and boycott whatever you want, 'fo sho. And you can consider it stupid if you want. The rule/law is 'no religious symbols in public buildings/places/seals/etc.' It's been upheld countless times now. Intent doesn't matter, and that's been constantly reaffirmed throughout the cases involving this.
We done here, 'Fo sho?
Using my Olympic Slogan in a debate on NSG? Wow, nice flamebaiting attempt, want a cookie? And once again, I want to look at specifics; I don't want to adhere universally to broad and general principles. Now that you've been informed, use my Olympic Slogan, (which I've never used on NSG, and only used for RPing purposes,) again, in a mocking fashion, and you will be reported.
Harkonna wrote:Is this the part where you fabricate a moronic 'gotcha' attempt? Really? Come off it.
Harkonna wrote:Not even just stupid! Moronic. Yum. The reason I don't humor the babbling of people who have proven themselves to be the constructors of idiotic arguments and painfully obtuse theoreticals, is because it's tedious, aggravating, and ultimately pointless. As, instead of sticking to their argument after it's been shot down, they look to the next page in their handbook, and parrot out the next line of nonsense.
You know, like a parrot.
Look at my funny looking emote;
:V ~ BAWK EYE EM PERROT!
Harkonna wrote:'Fo sho's point, is apparently that we all have the right to hold different opinions.
What he doesn't get, is that whether his opinion on whether a law is stupid or not, has no bearing on court proceedings.
That about right, 'Fo sho?
All of these posts are on the same page: viewtopic.php?ns=1&f=20&t=192881&p=10369925
Not sure if actionable, but can we at least get a cool down notice?


