
by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:32 pm

by Katganistan » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:38 pm
One Stop Rules Shop wrote:viewtopic.php?f=16&t=13#p92
Mod Oppression and Mod Bias: NationStates moderation is based on acting against rule-breaking in the games and the forums. Political opinions do not factor into official decisions by moderators. We make our rulings and interpretations as official representatives of NationStates, and are acting in the name of Max Barry. Our only agenda is RULES ENFORCEMENT. It's often the case that posters who lack the control to post within the rules also hold strong opinions on other matters, and it may appear that the mods are suppressing a particular viewpoint. This is NOT the case. Anyone who shares that viewpoint and manages to post within the rules is welcome to express their opinion.

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:42 pm
Katganistan wrote:One Stop Rules Shop wrote:viewtopic.php?f=16&t=13#p92
Mod Oppression and Mod Bias: NationStates moderation is based on acting against rule-breaking in the games and the forums. Political opinions do not factor into official decisions by moderators. We make our rulings and interpretations as official representatives of NationStates, and are acting in the name of Max Barry. Our only agenda is RULES ENFORCEMENT. It's often the case that posters who lack the control to post within the rules also hold strong opinions on other matters, and it may appear that the mods are suppressing a particular viewpoint. This is NOT the case. Anyone who shares that viewpoint and manages to post within the rules is welcome to express their opinion.
That thread, while some may believe it to be parody, is pretty much textbook trolling.

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:50 pm

by Galloism » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:55 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:I'd like to know why mocking fictional characters is trolling.

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:58 pm
Galloism wrote:Aloha Mars 2 wrote:I'd like to know why mocking fictional characters is trolling.
I'd say it would have to do with the number of people who believe that he's real and take him seriously, of which you're well aware. You knew that it could have (and likely would have) garnered vitriolic replies, and that was the intent. Therefore, it's trolling.

by Galloism » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:00 pm

by Kryozerkia » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:00 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:I belive Bender the robot is real. If you insult him, I'll report you for trolling.

by Melkor Unchained » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:03 pm

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:12 pm
Melkor Unchained wrote:Uhh.. news flash: I'm an atheist. I locked the thread because it's trolling, not because I was personally offended by it. The OP had no substance and was clearly not intended to spark anything resembling a serious debate. The line "mohamed and i are no and have been for over 1000 years homosexual lovers in heaven. now after closely watching the social trends on earth we have decided the time has come for us to marry" was what put it over the top. That's trolling defined.

by Dread Lady Nathicana » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:13 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Melkor Unchained wrote:Uhh.. news flash: I'm an atheist. I locked the thread because it's trolling, not because I was personally offended by it. The OP had no substance and was clearly not intended to spark anything resembling a serious debate. The line "mohamed and i are no and have been for over 1000 years homosexual lovers in heaven. now after closely watching the social trends on earth we have decided the time has come for us to marry" was what put it over the top. That's trolling defined.
Oh, so you are against homosexuality then?

by Melkor Unchained » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:13 pm

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:15 pm
Melkor Unchained wrote:Uhh.. news flash: I'm an atheist. I locked the thread because it's trolling, not because I was personally offended by it. The OP had no substance and was clearly not intended to spark anything resembling a serious debate. The line "mohamed and i are no and have been for over 1000 years homosexual lovers in heaven. now after closely watching the social trends on earth we have decided the time has come for us to marry" was what put it over the top.

by Galloism » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:24 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Melkor Unchained wrote:Uhh.. news flash: I'm an atheist. I locked the thread because it's trolling, not because I was personally offended by it. The OP had no substance and was clearly not intended to spark anything resembling a serious debate. The line "mohamed and i are no and have been for over 1000 years homosexual lovers in heaven. now after closely watching the social trends on earth we have decided the time has come for us to marry" was what put it over the top.
^

by Melkor Unchained » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:26 pm

by Aloha Mars 2 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:29 pm
Melkor Unchained wrote:I know what I said. If I locked threads for no other reason than being friendly to homosexuality, I wouldn't get anything else done and would lose my job in a matter of hours. Let's look at the facts.
FACT: Christians and Muslims alike are likely to be offended at the insinuation that their respective messiahs have been "homosexual lovers" for the last millennia.
FACT: The OP knows this.
FACT: The OP does not raise any issue for debate.
Therefore, the thread is a troll thread.
My attitude concerning gays has nothing to do with my decision to lock this. If I were anti-gay, I should think that I would enjoy watching lesbians far less than I actually do. What people do with their reproductive organs in their spare time is none of my concern. Any other straws you want to grasp at, or are we done here?

by Melkor Unchained » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:34 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:So this ruling is about appeasing outdated superstitions? I see. Insulting fictional characters = trolling. I'll remember that next time some one insults Benjamin Sisko.

by Katganistan » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:35 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:Melkor Unchained wrote:I know what I said. If I locked threads for no other reason than being friendly to homosexuality, I wouldn't get anything else done and would lose my job in a matter of hours. Let's look at the facts.
FACT: Christians and Muslims alike are likely to be offended at the insinuation that their respective messiahs have been "homosexual lovers" for the last millennia.
FACT: The OP knows this.
FACT: The OP does not raise any issue for debate.
Therefore, the thread is a troll thread.
My attitude concerning gays has nothing to do with my decision to lock this. If I were anti-gay, I should think that I would enjoy watching lesbians far less than I actually do. What people do with their reproductive organs in their spare time is none of my concern. Any other straws you want to grasp at, or are we done here?
So this ruling is about appeasing outdated superstitions? I see. Insulting fictional characters = trolling. I'll remember that next time some one insults Benjamin Sisko.

by Kryozerkia » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:36 pm
Aloha Mars 2 wrote:So this ruling is about appeasing outdated superstitions? I see. Insulting fictional characters = trolling. I'll remember that next time some one insults Benjamin Sisko.

by New Xania » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:36 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bhang Bhang Duc, Femcia, Galactic Powers, Hdisar, New Chilokver, Picairn, Zupitse
Advertisement