I'm not sure...

[Derscon]

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10442#p360319

I'm not actually sure if this violates TOS or not, since the pic is only hotlinked, not imagetagged, and not particularly graphic, but I figured I'd drop it here just to make sure. Wouldn't want any nasty moralistic crusaders to start suing NS, after all.

[Kryozerkia]

There seems to be no picture.

[Valipac]

http://www.atddm.com/amanu1.jpg

That's the link, it appears in the post for me.

[Derscon]

There seems to be no picture.

She who would one day be mother of the next Pharoah to illuminate the Obsidian Throne of Anarcanis, The Celestial Princess Che'mere Selene strolled on silent paws besides the Ambassadress from the Celestial Imperia, Lady Kaminari Kitirchiba noh Yamato.

First paragraph.

[Kryozerkia]

There seems to be no picture.

She who would one day be mother of the next Pharoah to illuminate the Obsidian Throne of Anarcanis, The Celestial Princess Che'mere Selene strolled on silent paws besides the Ambassadress from the Celestial Imperia, Lady Kaminari Kitirchiba noh Yamato.

First paragraph.

It shows up as a text link for me, not as an image. But clicking it does take me there. However, as it is just text I don't see the issue.

On the actual image itself. I would have to say, a warning on the part of the author may be in order. I'll leave it to another mod to determine if it should be removed.

[The Fedral Union]

Now some guy is deciding to be funny and troll the thread..

[Derscon]

There seems to be no picture.

She who would one day be mother of the next Pharoah to illuminate the Obsidian Throne of Anarcanis, The Celestial Princess Che'mere Selene strolled on silent paws besides the Ambassadress from the Celestial Imperia, Lady Kaminari Kitirchiba noh Yamato.

First paragraph.

It shows up as a text link for me, not as an image. But clicking it does take me there. However, as it is just text I don't see the issue.

On the actual image itself. I would have to say, a warning on the part of the author may be in order. I'll leave it to another mod to determine if it should be removed.

It is a text link, that's why I quoted the post. Sorry I wasn't clearer in the OP. But yeah, the fact it was a text link was why I was unsure if it actually violated the TOS or not.

[Kryozerkia]

It is a text link, that's why I quoted the post. Sorry I wasn't clearer in the OP. But yeah, the fact it was a text link was why I was unsure if it actually violated the TOS or not.

I would say that I would leave it for now. It appears to serve a purpose as being part of the actual RP.

[Derscon]

It is a text link, that's why I quoted the post. Sorry I wasn't clearer in the OP. But yeah, the fact it was a text link was why I was unsure if it actually violated the TOS or not.

I would say that I would leave it for now. It appears to serve a purpose as being part of the actual RP.

What, the picture? Okay. I just know Naggeroth was once deleted for linking to a site which happened to have a javascript advertisement for pr0nz that he didn't know about, so wasn't sure on the policy.

Thanks for checking.

[Kryozerkia]

It is a text link, that's why I quoted the post. Sorry I wasn't clearer in the OP. But yeah, the fact it was a text link was why I was unsure if it actually violated the TOS or not.

I would say that I would leave it for now. It appears to serve a purpose as being part of the actual RP.

What, the picture? Okay. I just know Naggeroth was once banned for linking to a site which happened to have a javascript advertisement for pr0nz that he didn't know about, so wasn't sure on the policy.

Thanks for checking.

It is just an image with no scripts on the page. I have "noscripts" and when I checked it, I had no scripts I had to enable or disable.

[The Fedral Union]

viewtopic.php?t=10442&f=5&view=unread#p372621 <---- I do not think that's constructive to the rp they are holding.

[Kryozerkia]

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?t=10442&f=5&view=unread#p372621 <---- I do not think that's constructive to the rp they are holding.

I would be inclined to agree. Removed.

[Derscon]

It is just an image with no scripts on the page. I have "noscripts" and when I checked it, I had no scripts I had to enable or disable.

Well, yeah. It was the image I was unsure about, what with the fact it could be interpreted as anthropomorphic pornography, but I don't know what the TOS's stance on tasteful nudity vs pornographic imagry is.

[Tanaara]

As I am the one who provides web space for my friend Anarcanis, I've cropped the pic and sent him an email explaining the concern.

[Tanara]

As the OP could I request that this post by Telros be deleted?

viewtopic.php?p=373313#p373313

Thank you kindly.

[Daistallia 2104]

As I am the one who provides web space for my friend Anarcanis, I've cropped the pic and sent him an email explaining the concern.

Aha. That explains away the question I had.