[r]derailng/trolling

[Aclion]

viewtopic.php?p=30919259#p30919259
This guys been spending the past day misrepresenting peoples posts to start semantic arguments. I've already ignored him, now he's switched to someone else.

[Katganistan]

You'll have to link proof that he's misrepresenting arguments. That simply looks like you disagree.

[Aclion]

You'll have to link proof that he's misrepresenting arguments.

Here's the first instance. viewtopic.php?p=30911906#p30911906
If you actually read the thread you can find more.

That simply looks like you disagree.

Well if baseless accusations of bias are allowed... can I get a response from someone who doesn't have a dog in this fight?

[Luna Amore]

I'm not seeing anything above NSG snark.

If you have examples, please post them. I'm not trawling a 15 page thread on a hunch.

[Katganistan]

That simply looks like you disagree.

Well if baseless accusations of bias are allowed... can I get a response from someone who doesn't have a dog in this fight?

I'm glad you admit it's a baseless accusation, given it was a single comment that neither supported them nor was directed at you.

Silly reason to try to mod-shop when you were simply asked for proof of your complaint.

[Abidawe]

I'm not seeing anything above NSG snark.

If you have examples, please post them. I'm not trawling a 15 page thread on a hunch.

I did some trawling purely out of interest, nothing seems out of order to me (based on my understanding of the rules)

[USS Monitor]

I'm not seeing anything above NSG snark.

If you have examples, please post them. I'm not trawling a 15 page thread on a hunch.

I did some trawling purely out of interest, nothing seems out of order to me (based on my understanding of the rules)

You're not a mod, and we didn't ask you.

[Abidawe]

I did some trawling purely out of interest, nothing seems out of order to me (based on my understanding of the rules)

You're not a mod, and we didn't ask you.

My apologies.