by Sionis Prioratus » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:40 pm
by Glen-Rhodes » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:58 pm
by Unibot » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:13 pm
Euroslavia wrote:11. Benevolent Dictatorship (High Social, High Economic, Low Political)
Euroslavia wrote:20. Father Knows Best State (Medium Social, Medium Economic, Low Political)
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Unibot » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:15 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Sionis Prioratus » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:28 pm
(--)Economic -----------Political Freedoms----Civil Rights(-- )
(15)Frightening---------Corrupted------------Widely Abused
(14)All-Consuming-----Widely Abused-------Frightening
(13)Powerhouse-------Excessive -------------Excessive
(12)Thriving-------------World Benchmark----World Benchmark
(11)Very Strong--------Superb-----------------Superb
*
(10)Strong--------------Excellent---------------Excellent
(09)Good----------------Very good-------------Very Good
(08)Fair------------------Good-------------------Good
(07)Reasonable--------Average---------------Average
(06)Developing---------Below Average------Below Average
*
(05)Struggling----------Some------------------Some
(04)Weak----------------Few--------------------Few
(03)Fragile---------------Rare-------------------Rare
(02)Basket Case-------Unheard Of-----------Unheard Of
(01)Imploded-----------Outlawed-------------Outlawed
by Unibot » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:46 pm
So, to be a "Benevolent Dictatorship", my civil rights must be at least "Superb", right?
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Unibot » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:54 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Sionis Prioratus » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:58 pm
Unibot wrote:The issue, "Going Postal" is a classic example of Economic Freedoms.
Option 1, which privatizes the national mail will slightly increase economic freedoms but also increase income inequality.
Option 2, which keeps the mail under the wing of the government, will slightly decrease your precious economic freedoms, but also decrease income inequality.
by Unibot » Fri Jul 24, 2009 5:01 pm
Vocenae wrote:Unibot, you have won NS.
by Bears Armed » Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:57 am
by Sionis Prioratus » Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:12 am
Bears Armed wrote:In addition to the current 'Economic Freedoms' rating as such, the 'Economic Strength' of a nation depends on that nation's history in this respect: If the country previously had very low economic freedoms for a long time but has just relaxed these a lot, for example, then its economy will take a while to grow to the strength that it would have had if they'd always had the higher level of freedoms... and, conversely, if the nation had previously had very high economic freedoms for a long while but its government has just nationalised everything then the inertia within the system will slow their economic strength's consequent decline...
by Sionis Prioratus » Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:17 am
76 minutes ago: Sionis Prioratus was reclassified from "Compulsory Consumerist State" to "Benevolent Dictatorship".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: [violet], Alt Capitalist Britain, Ankuran, Baharan, Daphomir, Dimetrodon Empire, East Malaysia, Gorutimania, Hulldom, Kostane, Mavenu, New Temecula, Nu Elysium, Terreich und Preussen, Umituida, Uniara
Advertisement