Page 1 of 1

Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:04 pm
by Zwangzug
Check the edit tag on this post...

(And December 31, 9999 won't be a Sunday, either!) :p

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 5:08 pm
by The Emmerian Unions
Zwangzug wrote:Check the edit tag on this post...

(And December 31, 9999 won't be a Sunday, either!) :p


THAT IS FREAKING EPIC! IT SHOULD STAY THAT WAY!

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:52 pm
by Spartzerina
:o :o :o

:clap: Well, I wouldn't mind this happening. I'll edit this post to see.

EDIT: Doesn't seem to have worked. What did he do to make it do that?

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:26 pm
by Daynor
How did you see that? ... Lol good catch though.

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:25 am
by Charlotte Ryberg
I believe it was an isolated date bug but well spotted Zwangzug! :p

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:48 am
by Bears Armed
"In the year ninety-nine ninety-nine,
If Man has still got a spine,
Will he walk, and will he run,
Or just lie there in the sun?"

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:37 am
by Zwangzug
Uh...thanks everybody!

Perhaps the problem is specific to this user?

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:21 am
by Unibot
Perhaps the problem is specific to this user?


Maybe its Max Barry !.... or (even more elusive), *OMG*, Max Berry!! :o :o :o

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:42 am
by Zwangzug
...Never mind, it's the user's signature. :oops: I feel stupid now...

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:51 am
by Unibot
..Never mind, it's the user's signature.


Oh wow. That's clever. Hehehe...

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:24 pm
by West-Flanders
Unibot wrote:
..Never mind, it's the user's signature.


Oh wow. That's clever. Hehehe...

I know, thought it'ld be funny :D

Anyhow, you're the first to notice

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:55 pm
by The Emmerian Unions
West-Flanders wrote:
Unibot wrote:
..Never mind, it's the user's signature.


Oh wow. That's clever. Hehehe...

I know, thought it'ld be funny :D

Anyhow, you're the first to notice

WF, to actually be accurate you should change Sun to Fri

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 2:26 pm
by Erastide
I wish he'd make it clearer it wasn't real >_>

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:50 am
by West-Flanders
Erastide wrote:I wish he'd make it clearer it wasn't real >_>


A watchfull observer could have noticed it's not a real "edit line" because the green thingy is not a link, you can't click it, it's just [color=..]. If I'ld used the clickable [nation=..]-tag, that's also green, you could've seen it's underlined (unlike the "edit line").

I've the signature for a couple of weeks already I guess, and this is the first one who noticed (or at least the first one who's reacting), though I have to admit I'm not that a big poster. But to avoid any more tech-threads about it being created, I'm willing to adapt it.

What if I use
Last edited by West-Flanders on Sun Dec 31, 9999 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

in stead of
Last edited by West-Flanders on Sun Dec 31, 9999 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

it'ld be ok? It's fairly self-explanatory..

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:03 am
by Erastide
That's a good way to point it out. :)

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:25 pm
by [violet]
I'm glad I read this whole thread before trying to bugfix that. :)

Re: Date wonkiness?

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:15 pm
by Linux and the X
It's easy to notice it's not real-- the edit line has a dashed hr, the sig line has a solid hr.