Hidden results on polls?
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2020 11:59 am
I've become increasingly aware of my "lemming-ness" on NS polls. I read through the options, don't have a strong opinion on any of them, and -- almost entirely by impulse -- vote for whatever the majority is picking. This isn't a lone observation by me. In the WA, there's universal acceptance for the "lemming effect", where disinterested players will vote for whatever side is winning. In leveraging this, some delegates will make an enormous effort to vote early. I've known some who will wake up in the dead of night, just to vote before going back to bed. The lemming effect just isn't arguable.
It wouldn't matter if the lemming effect existed on some silly poll. However, many regions will use the poll feature for 'serious' topics such as elections. Current examples:
This boosts on-site activity and is convenient. But the lemming effect is certainly likely to be prevalent.
I suggest that polls have the option to hide results until the end. This way, it would be impossible for the lemming effect to exist, simply because there is no majority to vote with. It's an elegant and hopefully-easy solution to a notable issue with polls.
It wouldn't matter if the lemming effect existed on some silly poll. However, many regions will use the poll feature for 'serious' topics such as elections. Current examples:
- Local Council Election - the South Pacific
- Delegate Election - South Pacific
- RP Head - West Europeia
- Some sort of amendment - The Democratic Sphere
- Etc
This boosts on-site activity and is convenient. But the lemming effect is certainly likely to be prevalent.
I suggest that polls have the option to hide results until the end. This way, it would be impossible for the lemming effect to exist, simply because there is no majority to vote with. It's an elegant and hopefully-easy solution to a notable issue with polls.