NATION

PASSWORD

Misleading wording on Liberations?

Bug reports, general help, ideas for improvements, and questions about how things are meant to work.
User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Misleading wording on Liberations?

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Mon Jun 08, 2020 5:04 pm

Hi,

Just saw a comment (below) suggesting that the wording on Liberations is misleading.

Jar Wattinree wrote:
The Ambassadors Reception wrote:The Liberation states that it applies to "Delegate-imposed barriers". So assuming that's true, this Liberation would be toothless.

No, it applies to ROs also. Only the Founder is immune to it.


Is Jar Wattinree correct?
If so, can we either get the wording on the Liberations clarified so that it's inclusive of RO imposed passwords, or the mechanics changed so that it only applies to Delegate passwords.
I'm indifferent as to which, but I'd prefer the text to accurately reflect what it does.

If conversations had gone differently in this case, this technicality would have had a significant impact on our region.

User avatar
Refuge Isle
Envoy
 
Posts: 346
Founded: Dec 14, 2018
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Refuge Isle » Mon Jun 08, 2020 5:17 pm

It might be relevant for me to link Sedgistan's clarification the last time this came up.
Last edited by Refuge Isle on Mon Jun 08, 2020 5:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8849
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:06 pm

From what I understand, it's not quite a matter of who put up the barrier, but rather whether the region has a founder. So long as the region has an executive founder, it's immune to liberations, even if the password is imposed by someone other than the founder (though it would presumably have been done with that founder's approval). If a region had a founder but it ceases to exist, then any password imposed by the founder (or regional officers appointed by the founder) before it vanished will be subject to liberations until the founder returns.

So usually a liberation will apply to a password imposed by either a delegate or a regional officer appointed by a delegate (which is still ultimately the delegate's responsibility, in a sense), but not always.

User avatar
Sedgistan
Senior Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 28627
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Mon Jun 08, 2020 10:33 pm

Trotterdam is correct.

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Mon Jun 08, 2020 11:27 pm

Sedgistan wrote:Trotterdam is correct.

Thanks all for the clarification.

Can we get the wording changed to match the reality please?

I was quite ready to see my founderless region Liberated, while under the false impression that it was safe because it was passworded by an RO and not a delegate.

I appreciate that this type of incident isn't a regular occurrence, but the impact of that would have been huge.

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Fri Jun 19, 2020 1:27 pm

Bump.

Can we get the wording updated to reflect what actually happens?

Maybe "Removes barriers imposed on founderless regions", or something like that.

Better suggestions are welcomed.

User avatar
Aurum Raider
Envoy
 
Posts: 214
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Father Knows Best State

Postby Aurum Raider » Sat Jun 20, 2020 2:07 pm

I kind of think it's a technicality so specific it doesn't really warrant a change to the wording itself - it's worded quite well.
There should definitely be elaboration for concerned parties in the pinned threads in technical/gameplay/WASC - the Gameplay Guide should definitely cover this - but it is a really niche 'ruling.'
Atagait Vytherov-Denral, Supreme Doggo of An Incidentally Hazardous Area
Raider Purist | Your Region's Persona Inesistente

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:35 pm

Bump again.
Looking for a change of text, which I would hope is easier than a change of code.

The current wording for Liberations reads:
"A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region."
Whereas it only strikes down Delegate-imposed barriers if the region is founderless. So it's misleading.
It also fails to mention that RO or Founder imposed barriers also get struck down by a Liberation if the region is founderless. So it's incomplete.

Wording such as:
"Removes barriers imposed on founderless regions" would describe exactly what it does.

It would mean that the leading Gameplayers in NS wouldn't be misunderstanding what Liberations do.
It would mean that Sedgistan wouldn't need to keep clarifying the same misunderstandings.

There seems to be a lot of confusion on this issue, so I feel that clear text would help.

On the 'Liberate The Embassy' thread, Jakker, Jar Wattinree, and Wayneactia appeared to think that founder imposed passwords would not be affected by a Liberation. I thought that our password would not be affected because it was added by an RO, not a delegate. Awesomeland012345 thought that if we unendorsed the delegate, we'd no longer have a delegate, making the Liberation ineffective.

Refuge Isle kindly points out that Sedgistan had to clarify this as recently as Feb 2020 on the 'Liberate Opstan' thread, where Tinhampton and Ransium thought founder passwords would be unaffected, Kuriko seemed unsure, and Lord Dominator asks for clarification.

I'd hope it was an easy change to make, and would save much confusion. Thanks!

User avatar
Sedgistan
Senior Issues Moderator
 
Posts: 28627
Founded: Oct 20, 2006
Anarchy

Postby Sedgistan » Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:30 pm

A Liberation takes effect when the Founder is ceased to exist, and thus the Delegate position is Executive. In that situation any passoword is considered to be imposed upon the region by the Delegate position, which is the ultimate Executive authority, regardless of who instituted it.

User avatar
Trotterdam
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8849
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Trotterdam » Thu Jul 02, 2020 3:01 am

Sedgistan wrote:In that situation any passoword is considered to be imposed upon the region by the Delegate position, which is the ultimate Executive authority, regardless of who instituted it.
That is not a vocabulary distinction most speakers of English would recognize.

It is also not how the game factually works, since the functioning of passwords is fully automatic and is does not have to be actively enforced by any player, delegate or otherwise.

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:37 pm

Trotterdam wrote:
Sedgistan wrote:In that situation any passoword is considered to be imposed upon the region by the Delegate position, which is the ultimate Executive authority, regardless of who instituted it.
That is not a vocabulary distinction most speakers of English would recognize.

It is also not how the game factually works, since the functioning of passwords is fully automatic and is does not have to be actively enforced by any player, delegate or otherwise.

^^
This

Trotterdam is obviously cleverer than me, because they understood what you said. It sounds to me like some subtlety that is relevant to those who graduated in Contract Law, but is just meaningless nonsense to the rest of us.
Last edited by The Ambassadors Reception on Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Sat Jul 18, 2020 1:45 pm

Bump

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Sat Aug 08, 2020 1:05 am

Bumpity-bump

User avatar
The Ambassadors Reception
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 49
Founded: Sep 16, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Ambassadors Reception » Sun Aug 30, 2020 11:27 pm

Bumpity-bumpity-bump

User avatar
Weed
Diplomat
 
Posts: 831
Founded: Oct 23, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Weed » Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:52 pm

I would agree this is not-so-clear. Especially since we were originally told years ago this was not the case. Sedge is probably going to say I’m wrong, and make me dig through threads from a decade ago, but I seem to recall that specifically because of my personal affinity for non-exec founder regions.

I think of regions I own like Bahamas, which I always wanted to launch as a non-exec but never got around to, being able to be Liberated. That’s a region that has never ever had a delegate in the 9 years I’ve resided there. I don’t think it is remarkably clear that the password on Bahamas is “delegate imposed”. It seems “A resolution to strike down barriers to free entry in a region with an executive delegate” is simple enough and adds clarity.

Maybe I know what my next project should be if I ever feel the itch to not be dead.
Last edited by Weed on Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pacifica
A Fun, New, Republican region
A Democratic & Free PACIFICA
Formerly Known as Topid
Ex-Defender
Former WASC Author
----V----
Weed
LIVE FREE


Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Drop Your Pants, The Municipalities of Antarctica

Advertisement

Remove ads