by Stellonia » Tue May 12, 2020 1:19 pm
by Harmonic Empire » Tue May 12, 2020 5:38 pm
Stellonia wrote:At the moment, the General Assembly is voting on a resolution that is losing by 85% to 15%, and it will continue to vote on this resolution. Meanwhile, there are two other proposals awaiting a vote. I think that voting for this resolution should have ended some time ago.
In my opinion, there should be some sort of "mercy rule" which states that if a resolution at vote is winning or losing by a large enough margin after a certain period of time, the vote should end prematurely. What do you guys think about this?
by Stellonia » Tue May 12, 2020 7:30 pm
Harmonic Empire wrote:Stellonia wrote:At the moment, the General Assembly is voting on a resolution that is losing by 85% to 15%, and it will continue to vote on this resolution. Meanwhile, there are two other proposals awaiting a vote. I think that voting for this resolution should have ended some time ago.
In my opinion, there should be some sort of "mercy rule" which states that if a resolution at vote is winning or losing by a large enough margin after a certain period of time, the vote should end prematurely. What do you guys think about this?
There is nothing wrong with 5 days WA voting duration, why do we need another rule?
by Saturna1ia » Tue May 12, 2020 7:36 pm
by Stellonia » Tue May 12, 2020 7:37 pm
Saturna1ia wrote:Stellonia wrote:Some votes are too long. When a vote is going 85-15, there is no need to keep it going any longer.
There have been instances where votes have completely flipped from For to Against, and vice versa, because the duration of Resolutions at vote allows further inspection and dissection of the Resolutions in question. Simply be patient.
by Saturna1ia » Tue May 12, 2020 7:44 pm
Stellonia wrote:Saturna1ia wrote:There have been instances where votes have completely flipped from For to Against, and vice versa, because the duration of Resolutions at vote allows further inspection and dissection of the Resolutions in question. Simply be patient.
Do you know of any such examples?
by Harmonic Empire » Tue May 12, 2020 7:57 pm
Stellonia wrote:Saturna1ia wrote:There have been instances where votes have completely flipped from For to Against, and vice versa, because the duration of Resolutions at vote allows further inspection and dissection of the Resolutions in question. Simply be patient.
Do you know of any such examples?
by Mallorea and Riva » Tue May 12, 2020 10:08 pm
Stellonia wrote:At the moment, the General Assembly is voting on a resolution that is losing by 85% to 15%, and it will continue to vote on this resolution. Meanwhile, there are two other proposals awaiting a vote. I think that voting for this resolution should have ended some time ago.
In my opinion, there should be some sort of "mercy rule" which states that if a resolution at vote is winning or losing by a large enough margin after a certain period of time, the vote should end prematurely. What do you guys think about this?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Andsons Irillightede, Barbartopia, Benzie, Bob the 3ed, Bormiar, British Arzelentaxmacone, Ducky, Ehrijeters, Free Toast, Giovanniland, Great Yue, Haku, Heromerland, IDEVK, Imperial German State, Karinif, Kaulga, Khantin, Land Without Shrimp, Larsez, Migre, Miraregna, Moloto Japan, Mutual Economic Assistance, Myanerus, Namej, New Westmore, Newest USSR, North American Imperial State, Poulton-with-Fearnhead, Pyhdon, Reyo, Rogue River, Saint Monkey, Schardonia, Second Scratch Empire, Skalliad, Sumoriant, Superior Saxonia, Telnuhq, The Cerberus union, The High Academy of Aztec, The Plough Islands, The United Good, Tianjastan, Very totally free, Xoshen, Zombie Rats
Advertisement