Proposed Change: Professional food critics checked out thousands of restautants and home kitchens and called it "work", judging ingredient quality, creativity and diversity of food.
by Leutria » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:52 pm
Proposed Change: Professional food critics checked out thousands of restautants and home kitchens and called it "work", judging ingredient quality, creativity and diversity of food.
by Trotterdam » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:55 pm
by Drawkland » Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:58 pm
Trotterdam wrote:I'm honestly surprised this is a thing we can track, given that it doesn't link well to any of the existing stats. But I guess the admins found a way.
United Dalaran wrote:Goddammit, comrade. I just knew that someday some wild, capitalist, imperialist interstellar empire will swallow our country.CN on the RMB wrote:drawkland's leader has survived so many assassination attempts that I am fairly certain he is fidel castro in disguise
by Leutria » Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:12 pm
by Outer Sparta » Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:41 pm
by Leutria » Thu Nov 21, 2019 12:18 am
by Merconitonitopia » Thu Nov 21, 2019 12:56 am
Leutria wrote:(all of the food industries and agriculture)
by Storalia » Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:01 am
Canonically now named Storal.The Church of Satan wrote:Pretty Much God wrote:Well they do, just inside of Potato Alliance
Don't give a non-existent faction credit for our achievements. Since 4AM (EST) The Potato Alliance has worked around the clock to exact its revenge on The Horsemen. UPPERCUT has played no part in this. It is just the raging fury of countless potatoes.
by Aclion » Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:38 am
Leutria wrote:Since [violet] is looking for weird corner cases, I am wondering if this one I found is one of them. The Ascendant Hive ranks really high in a lot of census categories that could be related (all of the food industries and agriculture) and yet has the lowest score for this census I have seen. Perhaps some over stat is overriding these ones to create such a low score?
by Pambudia » Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:43 am
Garuda Pambudia | Business Outlook | Embassy Program
Proud Member of Indonesia Raya
Bersama - sama kita bersatu dalam ideologi Pancasila
by Marxist Germany » Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:46 am
by Bears Armed » Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:50 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Nov 21, 2019 7:59 am
Bears Armed wrote:How do we find out what the scale for this stat is, to see where our own nations fit in overall?
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:22 am
by Lillorainen » Thu Nov 21, 2019 8:26 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:What I'll give you guys for free is that food quality is going to gain from a strong prioritisation of the finer things in life, and being open to diversity.
by Bears Armed » Thu Nov 21, 2019 10:46 am
The New California Republic wrote:Bears Armed wrote:How do we find out what the scale for this stat is, to see where our own nations fit in overall?
I suppose one very rough way of doing it is through a sample test, to see from some random nations where your value fits in.
https://www.nationstates.net/page=beta?sample_test=21
From that it seems that my own value, 303.75, will be on the medium to high side. Yours is 424.68, so likely in the top 1% at a guess.
by Land Without Shrimp » Thu Nov 21, 2019 3:03 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The creation of this stat is a bit cheeky, as we don't really have the exact numbers we need for a measurement. Rather it's a funky composite stat driven by the things that I thought might push food quality. It's a little mad in some of its outcomes, but there is some method to that madness.
What I'll give you guys for free is that food quality is going to gain from a strong prioritisation of the finer things in life, and being open to diversity.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:20 pm
by Ancient of Days » Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:37 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The creation of this stat is a bit cheeky, as we don't really have the exact numbers we need for a measurement. Rather it's a funky composite stat driven by the things that I thought might push food quality. It's a little mad in some of its outcomes, but there is some method to that madness.
What I'll give you guys for free is that food quality is going to gain from a strong prioritisation of the finer things in life, and being open to diversity.
by The New California Republic » Thu Nov 21, 2019 5:38 pm
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:I'm so glad that I went with a wholly made up unit for this stat. Stats which use RL units are bloody hard to calibrate, as it turns out.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:08 am
Ancient of Days wrote:Candlewhisper Archive wrote:The creation of this stat is a bit cheeky, as we don't really have the exact numbers we need for a measurement. Rather it's a funky composite stat driven by the things that I thought might push food quality. It's a little mad in some of its outcomes, but there is some method to that madness.
What I'll give you guys for free is that food quality is going to gain from a strong prioritisation of the finer things in life, and being open to diversity.
Ohhh, that sort of food quality Here I was assuming it was about safety regulations and health inspections. I really like this idea!
by Trotterdam » Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:17 am
I'm guessing we can also blame the lack of serial comma on that?Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Typical CWA sloppiness,
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:29 am
by Trotterdam » Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:50 am
I believe you made another typo. That one is supposed to be "objectionably".Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Oh no, that one is objectively correct.
by Verdant Haven » Sat Nov 23, 2019 10:33 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement