This was brought up in the gameplay thread about WA blockers, I think it merits consideration regardless of whether they become a problem.
Basically the way it works is, when a proposal achieves quorum instead of immediately going to the voting queue a proposal would wait for a period of 24 hours. During this period, called holding, a proposal cannot be prevented from going to vote by removing approvals but can be removed for illegalities. This ensures that Gensec will always have a minimum of 36 hours to review the legality of a proposal once it is submitted, and 24 from when when it's known that it will go to vote. This alleviates some of the surprises when authors submit proposals without warning immediately after update and then campaign to try to get the proposal to vote within 24 hours(sometimes they manage 12.), so there should be fewer illegal proposals getting to vote. It also means that there's not as much of an issue with lowering the quorum, which is what seems to be the favored response to WA blocker ops if they become a problem.
And as an added bonus it means that for those regions whose delegates vote according to a regional poll or the deliberations of a ministry have a period in which to do that, so we don't have to play guess-who-makes-quorum either.